I’d prefer to get a VPN to avoid the risk of my internet getting shut down, but I’m not aware of what the options for Linux are. I figured this would be a good place to ask.

  • bardmoss@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The only VPNs which are not owned by marketing companies are Mullvad and Proton. The largest VPNs are owned by Kape Technologies, renamed because their prior company name distributed malware, whose top people are former Israeli military, so I wouldn’t trust them as far as I could throw them. I would never use a free VPN except for Proton, and Proton’s paid VPN has a lot more nodes and features.

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mozilla’s VPN is just reselling Mullvad, so you can support Mozilla and use Mullvad at the same time if you like.

        • Artemis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          That only benefits the Mozilla Foundation and not the Cooperation who is responsible for developing Firefox. If you want your money to be used for Firefox, then you need to spending it towards the Cooperation AFAIK.

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      IVPN doesn’t do any kind of marketing, none… And Windscribe is FOSS too ( too bad it’s US based tho ), another one I can think of is TorGaurd ( proprietary ), they received a court subpoena but they revealed nothing about their users ( they don’t keep logs )…

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m a Proton die hard but I hear their Linux VPN client is lacking. I use all of their products but not on Linux.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You don’t really need a client unless you want to do something fancy like port forwarding which they don’t support anyway

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also lesser known PrivateVPN has no ties to marketing companies. Supports port forwarding, Wireguard, decent price, and is no log.

      Been using them for years without complaints.

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 months ago

    Proton and mullvad are the two best options I know of.

    Pretty much any VPN provider is usable on Linux though, network manager can handle wireguard or openvpn configs just fine. Your biggest concern should be trustworthiness.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    Mullvad has an open source client. It can also be set up usung OpenVPN too.

    Bear in mind they don’t have Port Forwarding anymore.

  • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m a Proton slave, all my eggs are in their basket so I’ll go ahead and provide some free marketing for them. ProtonVPN is pretty good since it’s ran by a good company that cares about you, getting Port Forwarding setup on Linux is a bit of a chore but I believe they’re working on automating it, the Windows app does have it automated already by the way.

    I do worry about the long-term practicality of ProtonVPN because of this manual process, since as far as I can tell there’s no way to automatically hand your assigned port to the torrent client…

  • UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ll vouch for airvpn. I’ve been using it for probably six years now with no issues. When using wireguard I can download Linux isos at 500mbps.

  • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Mullvad, it has ipv6 and works on linux even if you don’t use NetworkManager. Protonvpn doesn’t have ipv6 and only works with networkmanager

    Also last I checked, mullvad wireguard works in the app, whereas proton requires special setup

    • eatfudd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mullvad doesn’t offer port forwarding anymore if that’s important to you.

  • kbal@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pick one that has a wireguard config generator, so you don’t need to use any client software besides the normal linux wg client.

    I’d also look for one that accepts anonymous payment methods. Even if you don’t intend to go to the trouble to use that yourself, it’s probably a good sign if it’s available. Mullvad is pretty safe and served me well until they stopped doing port forwarding. Proton, windscribe, azire, and airvpn were the ones that seemed most recommended when I went to look for a new one a few months ago.

  • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago
    • Mullvad: Very privacy focused, ok priced, very robust. Sadly they removed port forwarding not too long ago.
    • AirVPN: Good speeds, many servers, cheap, port fowarding.
    • ProtonVPN: Works well, specially if you like the idea of getting their services together (mail, cloud, vpn)
  • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Your OS doesn’t matter when picking a VPN provider.

    Others have mentioned plenty of good options.

    • Pantoffel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      It does matter in terms of ease of use. Some have apps, some don’t. A non-linux-native might have difficulties with the latter.