The pirates are back - Anew study from the European Union’s Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) suggest that online piracy has increased for the first time in years. In fact, piracy rates have bee…::We analyze a new study where the EUIPO suggests online piracy is on the increase within the European Union.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    417
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love how it doesn’t mention the fact that services are getting objectively worse content as they stretch thin, are increasing their prices across the board, and cracking down on password sharing which was previously touted as a benefit.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      158
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. There’s too many platforms, not enough quality content on any one of them, and weaponized greed. Worse, these streaming services have “inspired” every asshole executive out there to make everything under the sun a subscription model.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The anti-piracy measures drive me to piracy, personally. There’s no technical reason I shouldn’t be able to stream 4K in Firefox, but Netflix won’t let me. I have to jump through hoops just to get 1080p, even. Same with most other services. I pirate shit I’m already paying for.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        85
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have done this several times for content on Disney+. I have an ultrawide, HDR1000 display. The movie I’m trying to watch is in 21:9 and available in HDR. Why in God’s name are you delivering it in SDR and in a letterboxed 16:9 which is in turn pillarboxed on my display?!

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          This so much. I’m lucky enough to be able to afford enough streaming services to cover the majority of what I want to watch (although that’s changing for the worse over time). I just want to pipe them all through Kodi or some other software into a unified interface that is media source agnostic, that can also stream the content in the best quality available for my screen.

          At that point the content is already paid for, I don’t need to use your own individual reinvention of the interface that inevitably focuses on pushing uninteresting content instead of making it as easy as possible to continue what I’ve already started watching or to find what I want.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also none of the apps have any kind of audio equalizer or range compression, so if you don’t have an audio receiver then you’re doomed to constantly turning up the volume for spoken sections. Absolute minimum viable product garbage.

          • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            For sure. Why should I suffer umpteen different video interfaces designed by separate entities who aren’t really in the business of designing highly functional video interfaces? I’d much rather play everything in mpv, which I can configure exactly the way I like it. I can adjust brightness and contrast, set up specific keyboard/mouse controls, adjust subtitle font/size/color/style/location, and I can even enable motion interpolation if I want to. I can fix those stupid hardcoded letterboxes with a keystroke. I can monomize or normalize audio. That’s because mpv’s entire reason to exist is to be a highly functional video player, and it’s open and extensible.

            Fuck your proprietary bare-minimum video interfaces. Even YouTube lags like 5-10 years behind the state of the art for video players, and most other services lag years behind YouTube.

            Do one thing and do it well!

            • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fully agree. Shit makes me so mad.

              It’s the same reason most car infotainment centers are awful. They aren’t software companies so their software sucks

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wonder how many Youtube users today ever used it when it used quicktime player, you could actually pause and buffer the entire video, it wouldn’t ever jump into an ad, it was the glory days. Aside from the fact it took a few minutes to load at times ahah.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, honestly same. There isn’t much I’m not already paying for, but being able to watch it all in one app (Stremio) is so much nicer.

        The push for more money, and no more password sharing, is just making me think more about cutting those services, but that wouldn’t stop me watching.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, the only thing I still pay for is Spotify, and as soon as they start carving up music into different exclusivity contracts I’ll go back to piracy for that as well. I’m willing to pay $10-$20/month for one streaming service, but they want you to spend like $200 on services you don’t even end up watching.

      It’s just greed, the way the streaming executives talked during the writers strike showed that. You could easily find an equilibrium that works for content creators and consumers, but the middlemen just want too much.

      • 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or vanish.

        Google play music merged into YouTube music.

        I already had a Plex server so I just rolled.my.own music server.

        And then with the emergence of plexamp… I don’t need a streaming music service now.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have they gotten better? I’ve not had great experience with PMS handling music, even when using PlexAmp, but I last tried maybe about a year ago.

            • kungen@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              My biggest pain points were that it seemed to do some kind of analysis (reading file information) on my library all the time, which wasn’t good when I have it on a cloud drive. Guess I’ll try it out again and hope they fixed all that :)

            • LordXenu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              What I wish it had was something similar to Roon which would be a Spotify integration. If I search for something and I don’t have it in my personal library, let me just stream it from my streaming service subscription.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        This fear is why I’m careful to maintain my old man MP3 and CD collection because I can’t fully trust a business.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think streaming music will be good for awhile at least, somehow, the fucking music industry got it right with streaming (At least on the consumer side, the artist side has been in trouble for some time now (esp with Spotify)). Most big services have most things and a handful of niche services to handle the gaps for the most part.

        Xbox Game Pass otoh for Games is a wildcard, who knows where that shits going to end up lmfao people should get in on it now while it’s still good lol

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, they’re already doing exclusivity contracts for podcasts (eg. Joe Rogan on Spotify only), it’s going to be a small leap to go to artists being exclusively on one service, and before you know the labels will all start their own streaming service, so you have to have different apps for Sony BMG artists, another app for indie artists, etc.

          The enshittification is mostly pushed by wall street, who want instant bigger profits, and they’re happy to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs in the process. Spotify is not immune to those pressures.

    • Jessvj93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      People aren’t also willing to spend as much on Oreo’s due to inflation so it’s also probably that if theres a game or movie everyone’s playing, sailing the seven seas is tried and true…and free.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. That’s when I went back to the seas. My family across 2 states uses Netflix and I already paid for the $20/month high tier. When they told my sister that it wasn’t about to be more expensive, I put my foot down and said I’m gonna setup a plex/overseer box on my on PC. It’s been working mostly alright.

    • Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was honestly really crazy to me when I was excited to see a game on sale, only to remember how I used to pirate everything. Steam has made it legitimately easier to buy games in so many cases.

      I sometimes still do pirate games, especially if it’s from a publisher I don’t respect or the cracked version is known to run better, but I buy almost all of my games now days.

      I’ve actually started setting up a home server for pirated movies and shows and getting rid of the couple streaming services I have.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I know a lot of people idolize him, and that’s probably not healthy, but he just gets it. Provide value and convenience for consumers, and consumers will stick around. Be an inconvenience while squeezing consumers for money, and we’ll leave with a parrot on our shoulders and a one-finger salute.

      • Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s a weird case, Steam has always been good for pc gaming and Valve releases nothing but polished games without anything predatory.

        He just seems to be interested in maintaining a successful business instead of squeezing more money out of people constantly.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ehh… for as great as Steam and Gaben are, TF2 really seems to have been the catalyst for all the ridiculous lootbox microtransaction mess we have nowadays.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That shit was coming with or without TF2, even if it was the first (which I don’t know if that’s the case). WoW gold farmers proved the concept that people are willing to pay for advantages or conveniences in games (and that was just the first game I played where I saw that, I bet it wasn’t the first), and buying packages with random content was done by MTG and baseball cards before that. It was inevitable that someone would put the two together.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Valve releases nothing but polished games without anything predatory.

          Counterpoint: Artifact.

          (I mostly agree on everything else though)

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sadly most companies are focused on short term profit over long term growth, Steam is the best example of the opposite.

  • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    211
    ·
    1 year ago

    The EUIPO speculates that financial pressures, like inflation, means that people have less money to spend on entertainment. This can be seen in the way that fewer people are signing up for Netflix or Amazon Prime – and some are even cancelling their subscriptions altogether.

    Ah yes, that’s the only reason. Not that streaming services are offering less content and functionality for more money, that can’t be it.

  • reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article wonders why would anyone pirate, let us give him the reason:

    1. Ads
    2. Multiple streaming services costing many times more than food. With nothing to see except for re runs and rehashes of old content.
    3. Ads
    4. Rising prices for poor service and shit content.
    5. Ads
    6. Geoblocking
    7. Ads
    8. Low quality videos even if you are willing to pay just because you don’t wish to use their specified player or browser. Why can’t I stream it to VLC player without the overhead of a browser.
    9. Ads
    10. All the while the CEO and the executive of the companies raking in billions on the money they are saying charging us for the artists.
        • CAVOK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. Forcing me to buy a new TV because my current one is suddenly an “unsupported device”.
          2. Not allowing me to watch Netflix in my summer house because they’re “cracking down on sharing accounts”.
          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is 14 really a thing? Or are you talking about having to buy a new smart device that may or may not be included in your TV and that in any case can be replaced but a separate device?

            • CAVOK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep. Very much. Translated to English it says “Netflix is no longer supported on this device. Visit netflix.com/compatibledevices for a list of supported devices”.

              This is when hitting the netflix button on the tv remote. Worked until a few days ago.

              • ours@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d chuck that up more to “smart TVs are trash”.

                They have crappy processing power and TV makers support them for the shortest of timespans. I’ve solved that but turning my smart TV into a dumb screen and an NVidia Shield TV as its brains (NVidia has so far been exemplary in supporting Shield TVs).

                • CAVOK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t disagree that smart TVs are trash, but this wasn’t the TV not keeping up, this was netflix deciding that I couldn’t use it anymore.

                  I give them money, why are they making it hard for me to use their product.

              • fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Vendors should be entitled to withdraw support on particular hardware, but they shouldn’t be allowed to brick the service as a result ‘just because’. All it needs is a TOS/EULA update prompt advising that viewers with X hardware are on their own as of now. I’d be willing to bet this denial of service practice originates in kickback discussions between TV manufacturers and streamers.

                It strikes me as another case where corporate can inculcate learned helplessness in the customer by having him think disallowing and withdrawing support for are indivisible.

        • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wouldn’t mind using proprietary apps if they weren’t so fucking horrible to use.

          Goddammit, if you’re going to force me to install your shitty program just because I want to watch a show you own the license to, at least put a semblance of effort into the UI…

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        1. Editing exsting content with no warning or notice (for whatever reason- political correctness or losing the soundtrack license doesn’t matter why)
        2. Ads.
    • TDCN@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also wanna add:

      1. Missing subtitles in the language you want (looking at you apple tv without English subtitles on local language movies.)
      2. Ads
      3. Only the 2 random seasons in the middle of a TV show are available. And new seasons not added.
      4. Ads
      • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As a person who loves watching movies with subtitles, this is why I’m canceling Amazon Prime. The fuckers literally won’t offer me English language subtitles for some flicks because I Iive outside the US.

        I don’t care if the movie itself is in English, why the hell can’t I watch with subtitles in the same language as the film itself? Holy fuck.

        • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          why the hell can’t I watch with subtitles in the same language as the film itself? Holy fuck.

          Probably because the subtitles have their own copyright separate from the film itself and Amazon likely doesn’t have the license to the English subtitles outside of the USA. It wouldn’t surprise me, music lyrics have their own separate copyright from the recording after all.

          The copyright system is the biggest problem here. It simply isn’t fit for purpose in the digital age, unless that purpose was to benefit a handful of legacy mega corps while harming independent content creators and stifling culture across the globe.

          • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Had no idea subtitles could be copyrighted separate from the film/media they’re subtitling (but, it does make sense when you think about it).

            I agree with you completely: the current US copyright system is a joke that serves little purpose (in today’s media scape).

            • GeekyNerdyNerd@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wish it was just the US copyright system that’s the problem, some nations have worse copyright laws. In France for example architecture can have copyright, and renovations have a separate copyright from the original architecture… The lights on the Eiffel Tower have a separate copyright from the Eiffel Tower itself, which is currently in the public domain. So while it’s completely fine to take a photo of the Tower during the day at night you need to have permission from the copyright holder, and they have taken action against people who have taken photos of the Tower at night.

              Then there are some nations where there isn’t even a public domain and stuff never loses their copyright.

              Many of these worse laws have been driven by US and EU trade policies and Trade Agreements mandating draconian copyright and intellectual property laws.

              Copyright laws are just a nightmare writ large.

        • TDCN@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          And rip watching a Christopher Nolan Movie without subtitles nowadays

          • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, exactly.

            Fuck you - if I’m paying to watch, I should get the very basic of features. Piracy is literally a better user experience right now.

    • ianovic69@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like there’s a common theme here but just can’t put my finger on it…

      This comment was brought to you by Google AdSense.

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also everything is just streaming. You can’t actually buy DRM-free movies (important for things like VR headsets or when without Internet), often you can’t even buy anything at all, it’s all just the library of the streaming service were content comes and goes at random.

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You forgot about stuff that just gets taken down one day.

      Edit: oh you added it in a comment.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are a few what I’ll term magnet shows on each streaming service. They want you to pay for the service for the magnet shows and then stick around and watch other half-baked filler garbage or a seasons of a show they cancelled before giving them any hope of finishing their story arc.

      Most streaming networks have abundant garbage content I’d never want to watch, knockoffs of other shows, and global content that’s often of soap opera quality with subtitles.

      They also (on purpose) often offer no way to filter to the things you want to see other than search, and search is often misleading or terrible too.

      It’s basically a race to the bottom just like Amazon. Junk programs created for pennies pretending to match your results.

      The whole thing is a crap fest that’s quickly becoming worse than the cable network structure it replaced.

      No, thank you.

      • Brutticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you go through the front page, there is usually only 100 shows the platform is pushing, ad nauseam. Like the algorithm is maybe some shows it thinks youll like, or shows they want to astroturf. I would really like a way to go into the dregs, the shit, the stuff netflix thinks is at the bottom of my metrics. Granted, piracy doesn’t do this either (lol how would that even work? I put everything on that server myself) but I would have considered keeping my subscription if they did.

  • Jerkface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s worth noting that although piracy is up, the rates are still far lower than they were 20, 10 or even five years ago. Whether people continue to access content illegally remains to be seen – hopefully this is just a ‘blip’ and rates of theft begin to fall again as the economy recovers.

    I can’t be bothered to pull back all the layers of naive optimism in just these two sentences.

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Stop making shit deals and 100 different services to subscribe to and people will go back to paying for things. Gaben is the only smart one.

      • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until this month I paid more than $100 for multiple streaming services. I finally got pissed off when something I wanted to watch was no longer available. Instead I went and torrented it and canceled 90% of the services. It’s time to go back to self streaming everything.

  • aredditimmigrant@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmmmmm. Let’s see here.

    People don’t like cable, because it’s too expensive and inconvenient

    People start pirating

    People like having 2-3 streaming services that show everything, without ads, for much cheaper even combined than cable. They stop pirating.

    People don’t like having 20-30 streaming services that show only a little in each service, NOW WITH ADS!?!?! and that become MUCH more expensive than cable ever was.

    People start pirating again…

    I wonder what happened?!?!

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The more you tighten your grip big tech, the more users will slip through your fingers”

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s reall not even about the prices. It’s just so inconvenient to go between all those apps, and then login forgot your password, rest, 2FA so i have to get up from my couch and grab my phone.

      All these paid services could be totally free from a monetary perspective and I still wouldn’t sign back up for them. It’s a worse service than cable TV used to be at this point.

      • aredditimmigrant@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing that is killing me is Netflixs attempt to crack down on password sharing.

        I share an account with a few family members. If I want to watch a program on Netflix, which my brother pays for, I have to call him up to get the unlock code. He has a newborn and sleeps weird hours.

        I end up just pirating it myself.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost like making it nearly impossible to watch what we want and, at the same time, octupling our bills, while also increasing the cost of each would, somehow, force people into the desperation of piracy. Huh. Who woulda thunk it.

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s not forget random pulling of content so that you can never tell if what you want is actually on any given service at any given time. This was the final straw that led me to rebuilding my own media collection.

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 year ago

    I 100% believe this. The video streamers are getting too greedy and pushing out too much subpar content. When it was affordable and easy to find what you want streaming was great. Now it’s expensive and stuff in on 12 different platforms.

    Also most of what I watch is older so everyone on the creative and production side has been paid the only ones making money at this point are the studio fat cats.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ads. It’s all because of ads. There is a low tolerance by way more people now, and piracy is more convenient than putting up with platforms that can’t build a UX to save their lives, and then put in ads. Fuck em, let them die.

    • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree in that I don’t necessarily think all of the content is subpar. But making everything on a different service and each service continues to jack up its prices makes it very difficult to justify subscribing to any one of them. Like, I’m never gonna subscribe to peacock even though it has a few things I’d watch on it, that’s ridiculous.

      Everything doesn’t have to be a different service, studios are just being extraordinarily greedy.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a bizarre parallel to picking a hospital in America while you’re unconscious in a merc ambulance.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine country where whereever ambulance brings you everything will be 100% covered by national insurance.

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow that wording, trying to make pirating sound like an evil crime lol. I feel no moral negativity pirating. In fact, my conscience is clean and I feel morally obligated to, considering how expensive they are making services.

    I think reading between the lines is the real story: when they get greedy, pirating puts them I check and causes pricing to become affordable and people stop pirating. Once people are not pirating, greed increases and pirates have to return to put them in place again.

    In conclusion… we need pirates to balance things out, this pirating is a necessity in our modern age…

    You are welcome everyone, I am doing my part for myself and I am doing my part for you.

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Another reason why piracy is needed is to prevent pieces of culture from being erased from history to satisfy some perverse corporate accounting requirements.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They call “refusing to be exploited” piracy. Generally industries where there are huge monopolies like media, groceries, and other such thing are most sensitive to this because they lack the ability to deal with outside pressures any more.

      Vilifying people fighting back is the cheapest way to manage this.

      I’m kinda looking forward to seeing what replaces things like Netflix and Spotify

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have subscriptions (and shared subscriptions) to… seven services that I can think of in 20 seconds.

    Yet, time and time again, I try to figure out if what I want to watch is covered by one of them (not trivial to figure out), and end up falling back on piracy probably around 50% of the time.

    Now that every fucking content owner has its own subscription plan, it makes subscriptions pointless because it’s spread so damn thin.

      • MashedTech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t always work. I’m not in the US. So shows that it says are on a service, aren’t in my country, or if it’s on a service, it doesn’t know because it’s on that service in my country and not the us. For me, Justwatch.com, has been more miss than hit. Sometimes, asking google works, but some services that are available in my country won’t integrate with Google in my country, but if use a VPN for the us on my Android TV it loads all the US features and the integration starts working and everything is correct. So yeah, unless you’re in the US, the experience of figuring out where it is what you want to watch is more miss than hit.

        • Bebo@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yes this is so true. I have stopped trying to research where each is that I want to watch; if it’s not on netflix or prime video I just download it.

        • gila@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Justwatch has localised results for me in Australia. If your browser is anonymized it may default to US listings. You can change it in the URL path using your country code, e.g. instead of justwatch.com/us/ I go to justwatch.com/au/ and it’s been totally accurate

    • danque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cancel all those subs man. They are eating your money without return. It’s better to download the specific show you want to watch.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe it was Gabe Newell who said the best way to avoid piracy is by making legitimate purchasing easier and/or better.

    In the early history of streaming services, you could get access to a lot of content in a straightforward way for not much money. People started doing that instead of pirating. The corporations got greedy, they made the services worse and increased the price to the point that piracy is preferable again.

    And I don’t have the least amount of sympathy. Yarr matey.

    • thorbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s funny because I pirate everything… except PC games. Because it’s so cheap and convenient on steam to just buy them, I like the tracked achievements thing and comparing to friends, and I can play the games on any PC or my steam deck with a quick login and install. I can easily download and install PC games from my private trackers but steam is just so easy and cheap. If movies and TV were as convenient and affordable as steam I wouldn’t pirate any of it. But as it stands, I’d have to pay over $200 a month just to have access to all the streaming services that have shows that I like. Fuck that noise. Someone needs to make a version of Steam for media. Kind of like Vudu but less crappy. Just let me pay a few bucks to own a series or a movie, have lots of good sales and deals, let me access the content on all platforms easily, and I would definitely start building a library over time like I’ve done with steam.

      edit: I still do pirate games on PC sometimes just to try them, but usually end up buying on steam because it works better and it can be played on multiple devices easily.

      • warmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And now that I switched to Linux, Steam releases Proton, like If I needed another reason to only get my games from them.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost all games these days have a requirement to be online to play them, even in single player, and are absolutely ridden with DRM, sometimes even to the extent that it installs rootkits like in the case of Uplay and Valorant. By not voting with your wallet and pirating it yourself, you’re doing yourself and the community at large a disservice. ^♪

        • thorbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          edit because they deleted:

          “Poopkins” wrote

          Almost all games these days have a requirement to be online to play them, even in single player, and are absolutely ridden with DRM, sometimes even to the extent that it installs rootkits like in the case of Uplay and Valorant. By not voting with your wallet and pirating it yourself, you’re doing yourself and the community at large a disservice. ^

          And I replied

          Okay then. I guess you didn’t even fucking read what I wrote.

    • Thoas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      With the advent of self hosted streaming services and the arr services the option is even easier now. If 1 in 20 ppl are motivated/tech savvy that’s 20 streaming products not being paid for.

      • Littleborat@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What would be the technology behind my own streaming platform?

        So far I do it very old school with data on my Nas and a software that catalogs and plays over Lan only.

        • DarthVader@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look into the arr suite of apps, radarr + sonarr + prowlarr to manage your library and jellyfin/PleX to play it. Get overseer for request management. You can set it up for remote access from anywhere, have people make requests on overseer and have the data available a few mins later. It’s amazing when it’s set up.

        • Thoas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Plex is the most worked on solution out there, runs on Windows, Linux and Linux headless. For the automation of stuff then looking at suff like radarr and sonar alovk with tracktarr and jackett foe the trackers, along with a torrent client. There is also jellyfin as a media client, it’s more open, but getting users onto it could be more problematic as it isn’t as straight fwd from what I hear, haven’t used it myself though.

  • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If not, we can expect to see legal channels raising their prices again to cover the losses caused by piracy.

    what a shitty take. Well, anyone who has better memory than only one month back can realize that the reason the people turned to piracy was that they raised their prices. There is no loss caused by piracy. They only missed potential gains. And the reason they raised their prices were not because they were loosing money. Was because they needed to “grow infinitely”. If the free market evangelists are right, the free market will self regulate and the prices will go down in order to attract back the lost customers lol

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not disagreeing with you—the conclusion these services have taken are indeed not logical ones based on historical trends—but I’m curious how you know these services didn’t need to raise the fees? Why have you assumed that it’s to “grow infinitely”?

      From my understanding, almost all streaming video providers except Netflix have been operating on a loss. That can only be sustained for so long before the parent company will need to see it begin to generate a positive revenue stream. The most straightforward way to do that is to increase subscription fees. Furthermore, the number of subscribers of Paramount+, MGM+ or even Disney+ is certainly not trending towards “infinite growth.”

      I’m not justifying anything, because with five monthly services that have been hiking prices I’m looking at what to slash myself, but I was eager to encourage a bit more discourse on this topic.

      • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That can only be sustained for so long before the parent company will need to see it begin to generate a positive revenue stream. The most straightforward way to do that is to increase subscription fees. Furthermore, the number of subscribers of Paramount+, MGM+ or even Disney+ is certainly not trending towards “infinite growth.”

        then their model is flawed. They sell something at loss in order to attract customers because they know that if they sell it at higher profit margins customers will not come. Customers are willing to buy it as long as it is in a price that they are willing to compromise at. So, when they raise their prices, customers realize that now it is above the price they are willing to pay and step out. Their model is based on hoping that the customers will forget or be bored to cancel a subscription that they cannot afford anymore. However it is a subscription that they wouldn’t had been willing to buy in this price in the first place.

        So, their initial market share and adoption rate was what it was because of the price of the subscription and the rate of price/value-of-product. Customers are not willing to pay double price and they wouldn’t had paid it in the first place. They are not loosing customers. They are not loosing potential profit. They are basing their numbers in a faked artificial audience that opted in only because it was a good deal in the initial price.

        And while the free market evangelists would argue that the market would self regulate, you know what will they in reality do? Ask the government for stricter enforcement of anti-piracy laws because huge loss . Loss based on nothing but their imagination of imaginative potential profit based on “if everyone was continuing buying our product with the same adoption rate we would had X billions. So since we don’t have X billions, this is a loss”. Great math skills and applying of logic.

        • poopkins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are certainly consumers out there with this kind of mentality, but it’s a common sales strategy to lure new customers with a reduced subscription fee for the first months only. It evidently works, because businesses have been doing this long before SVOD services, or even the internet for that matter, existed.

          I expect that indeed, a significant number of customers cannot be bothered to cancel a subscription once they begin to use it, or, put another way, perceive the value of it to be justified against the increased price. I don’t think it’s fair to call this a fake audience, because these are real users of which a certain percentage will be retained.

          Another factor that probably weighs into this is the competitive race to the bottom among the many SVOD offerings that are available today. Users like you and me perceive a certain dollar amount as the maximum that we are willing to pay, but where does that figure come from? If you are a new player in this space, you are effectively capped to the current market price for subscription fees, whether or not that covers your costs.

          The free market effect will gradually resolve this as services that are all currently operating at a loss will correct their price models, which is what I believe is currently happening.

          • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are certainly consumers out there with this kind of mentality, but it’s a common sales strategy to lure new customers with a reduced subscription fee for the first months only. It evidently works, because businesses have been doing this long before SVOD services, or even the internet for that matter, existed.

            Your claim that this is a tactic happening since for ever doesn’t take into account the differences between subscription model and traditional businesses. In traditional businesses, yes, a business may decrease the prices in order to lure customers, but this was never their business model. This was limited time “get to know us”. I don’t think there was for example any supermarket operating at loss for 5 years before they decide to “ok, lets put the real prices on the shelves now”.

            I don’t think it’s fair to call this a fake audience, because these are real users of which a certain percentage will be retained.

            of course it is a fake audience. The fact that some users will be retained doesn’t make the 100% of the audience real. And also by fake audience it doesn’t necessarily mean that the whole 100% of the audience is fake. However, when they present their numbers, and they claim that “because of piracy we lost 5 million subscribers” this is based on the 5 million subscribers who potentially would never be subscribers if they had their “real” price upfront, instead of a price in which they operate at loss.

            However, when people are charged for piracy, they are charged based on imaginative loses who are based on a potential profit which would had been achieved if their 100% of customer base had been continuing paying a subscription which they would had never agreed paying if the price was not faked in order to attract them.

            The free market effect will gradually resolve this as services that are all currently operating at a loss will correct their price models, which is what I believe is currently happening.

            the free market will turn to the government to cover their losses and they will push for stricter anti piracy law enforcement. The free market evangelists just want a free to control market. I don’t think they will be “ok, customers are leaving after our latest increase in price, then let’s just decrease the price to get them back on board”

            • Littleborat@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am pretty sure they know how many accounts they will lose for every dollar they increase the price. It should be a net positive for them because otherwise they would not do it.

              Enforcing terms and conditions that they previously did not is just another price increase in the grey area that is not directly perceived that way.

              I agree that “Lost x amount to piracy” does not even make sense in that context. They know exactly what they are doing.

            • poopkins@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              With regards to discounts to lure new customers, I was thinking about conventional subscription based services like newspapers or cable providers. It doesn’t seem unreasonable to me that in a sector with heavy competition, such services might be offered at an initial loss if data suggests that retained memberships can recoup it.

              I misunderstood what you were referring to with a definition of “fake audience.” I wasn’t giving any merit to their claims about how it all ties to piracy, clearly that’s nonsense. I’m not completely following your train of thought with a “fake price,” though.

              It’s possible this might result in a harsher stance on piracy again, that’s true. Realistically, though, I think it’s more likely that three things will happen: we as consumers will gradually recalibrate our cost expectations for streaming services, production corporations will cut costs with more reality type content, and smaller companies will either be bought up or go out of business as users settle on a deliberate few services to subscribe to.

              • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not completely following your train of thought with a “fake price,” though.

                you said that they now needed to correct to the “real price” in terms that it is a price that will allow them not to operate at a loss. So the previous one was a “faked” (artificial) price, that they knew was below cost, however they chose to go with it in order to lure customers.

                I’m not implying that they tried to scam anyone with “fake prices” if this is what you understood.

                • poopkins@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I see. Whether or not the price covers costs, businesses will often invest into attracting new customers, for instance through marketing campaigns or incentives to switch from a competitor. In such cases, the cost isn’t visibly calculated through to the consumer.

                  However, since the cost is a main factor for purchase decisions, companies might similarly invest in growing their customer base by offering a pricing tier below cost. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the service as a whole is operating at a loss, because there might be higher cost tiers that offer premium content or family plans. Different plans might also have degrees of underutilization that reduces service costs. Finally, cohorts of service tiers might change based on external factors like economic recession or competitive offerings.

                  All this is to say that pricing models are complicated, and breaking even with a SVOD service is extremely difficult in an industry with extremely high production costs, aging licensable content that viewers are losing interest in all while being overrun with complex, regional licensing agreements that affect both. Especially when this is further compounded with macroeconomic factors including inflation and interest rates that affect both corporations operating at a loss and consumers looking to tighten their belts or user decline due to subscription fatigue, an argument could be made that some middle ground needs to be found to simply remain in business.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is this being downvoted? I thought Lemmy was a place for discourse? How does this not contribute to an open discussion?

        • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty common take that people feel like they’ve seen and argued in a lot of other places. In the future, ask YOURSELF why you got downvoted, not the thread. Works way better.

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have genuinely asked myself this, and can’t help but find it strange that the only comments in this thread and other almost identical threads are effectively complaining about corporate greed, and never go into any kind of depth about underlying causes and contributing factors.

            Why instead is the same old empty rhetoric repeated and upvoted time and time again? This platform seems to be an echo chamber for ignorance.

            • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              and never go into any kind of depth about underlying causes and contributing factors.

              sure, if you don’t agree with what is being replied to you, then these are shallow comments. Your replies here were the deep analysis. Good job

              • poopkins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Whether or not the insights are deep or shallow, Lemmy would be an inclusive place where discourse is welcomed and civil interactions are commonplace.

                Instead, any comment that invites conversation to go more in depth is downvoted with ad hominem attacks, further adding toxicity to the cesspool that is the comment section behind effectively any post on this community.

                • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  downvotes is just a way to show that you disagree with something. It is not there to punish you. People choose some topics to engage actively by participating in the comments while in some other topics they prefer to express their opinion just by agree/disagree (upvote/downvote). Now you call a whole community toxic just because not everyone agrees with you…

            • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You misunderstand me. Your posts are the old empty rhetoric, your ideas are not new, and you come off like a parrot. After your long-winded explanation, I get the idea that you’re just young, which personally makes me want to interact with you less.

              • poopkins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I did not find any post here on Lemmy that discussed any of the reasons why subscription services are struggling (at least not the past 60 days that I browsed submissions and comments), which is why I chimed in to the conversation with context. If you did not find that insightful, that’s fine.

                At least we can agree that we don’t enjoy interacting with one another, no less because you are being a jerk.

    • sanqueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guess what also been increasing? The number of streaming platforms trying to out bid their competitors. You know what else is increasing? The number of streaming platforms going after account sharing and they wonder why people are going back to piracy. Piracy is king and no one will be able to stop it.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what I’m worried about….billionaires will convince governments (who haven’t banned them yet) a “think of the children act” which will ban VPNs

          • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh you sweet child. They only need to ban them for citizens, not for business / shareholders.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know about China, but Russia has not banned VPNs. They banned specific VPN services. I’m guessing it’s similar in China. And there are plenty of grey and black market VPN services for people in those countries to use. And they use them.

        • partizan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          VPN is basically just a encrypted channel between 2 systems, while one of them forward traffic to the internet and unless they block/filter every encrypted connection, there is no way to block it at mass…

          • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It can’t be impossible because certain countries have been trying. Hasn’t China already been fining people for using VPNs?

        • AAA@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, at some point people will remember that it’s possible to share things via USB stick or a drive.

          • NoRodent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Man, those were the times… Borrowing hard drives from friends, burning CDs, sharing lists of who has what…

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just cancelled my Netflix that I had for like 10 years. Total shit nothing to watch.

    Now there’s a million services, everything is plus. Paramount+, Disney+, Nutsack+

    Even if I wanted to pay for all that shit, everyone has their own shitty app I have to install and configure and have a login and fuck you.

    It’s just easier for me to torrent what I want.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is, I’m not averse to paying for good content, I like to support the creators. But

      When every show is on a different app and they’re all $15 a month…buying a couple hard drives and saving every show just makes more financial sense and I don’t need 15 different login credentials so fuck off yarrr

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now there’s a million services, everything is plus. Paramount+, Disney+, Nutsack+

      I think the + is to streaming services what the i prefix was to electronic junk.

    • burliman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I pay for them still. But still download and watch on Plex. Oh shit I meant a friend of mine does this.