While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a “Know Your Customer” policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you’ll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there’s jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It’s available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know how I indirectly said that. I certainly didn’t mean to. Its less well known, perfectly fine, and it’s killer feature for a long time has been being decoupled from privacy disrespecting big tech companies

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the only reason to use jitsi, just that most people wouldn’t bother seeking any alternative if they didn’t care.

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Main motivating factor” != “Only viable reason”

          Sorry for any unclarity I introduced. And yes, login via google vs full on google meet are two different things, but if I have to login via google for Jitsi I’m suddenly far more likely to use Jami

    • anlumo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My experience has been that Jitsi is much better when the connection is bad. However, its default setting is that video is cropped to be square, which is very bad. I don’t even think that the user can change that.