While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a “Know Your Customer” policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you’ll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there’s jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It’s available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

  • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how I indirectly said that. I certainly didn’t mean to. Its less well known, perfectly fine, and it’s killer feature for a long time has been being decoupled from privacy disrespecting big tech companies

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not the only reason to use jitsi, just that most people wouldn’t bother seeking any alternative if they didn’t care.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Main motivating factor” != “Only viable reason”

        Sorry for any unclarity I introduced. And yes, login via google vs full on google meet are two different things, but if I have to login via google for Jitsi I’m suddenly far more likely to use Jami