petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agoKill a Process Running on a Specific Port in Linux (via 4 Methods)linuxtldr.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux@programming.dev
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkKill a Process Running on a Specific Port in Linux (via 4 Methods)linuxtldr.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 months agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@programming.dev
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 months agoI think most Americans think of that as well. It’s even the first several Google search results for “ss”. Bad name choice. Though we (Americans) didn’t get the fun “tulip” bit.
minus-squarejol@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoThere’s so many poor names in FOSS but people refuse to change them out of attachment for history. One other example comes to mind: Gimp. Basically, devs are terrible at naming things.
minus-squareTerraRoot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoUnique and Bad names are very memorable
minus-squareTekkip20@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoLike WSUS for patching windows machines, very sus indeed :)
I think most Americans think of that as well. It’s even the first several Google search results for “ss”. Bad name choice.
Though we (Americans) didn’t get the fun “tulip” bit.
There’s so many poor names in FOSS but people refuse to change them out of attachment for history. One other example comes to mind: Gimp.
Basically, devs are terrible at naming things.
Unique and Bad names are very memorable
Like WSUS for patching windows machines, very sus indeed :)