• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      What, one failed experiment about 15 minutes after the paper was first published is sufficient grounds for declaring the technology a bust is it?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t have a history of making stuff up. Just because one group did doesn’t automatically mean everyone else is. The probability that something is made up doesn’t change just because somebody previously did or did not make something up.

        • Erk@cdda.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jeez you seem like you have some personal vendetta against this lab

      • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, but I’m leaning toward the side of caution. If the super-conductor is real it will be shown as such within a few weeks and will be revolutionary, and if not I’ll be less disappointed if I’ve steeled myself to the possibility.