“It’s the same reason that Boomers can’t leave Facebook.”
“The people who are stranded on social media platforms shouldn’t be mistaken for uncool, aging technophobes. They’re not stubborn, they’re stranded. Like the elders who can’t afford to leave a dying town after the factory shuts down and the young people move away, these people are locked in. They need help evacuating – a place to go and a path to get there.”
They aren’t “stranded”, they’re addicted to or rather emotionally reliant on these platforms. It is a choice, you can pull the plug. There’s a world out there.
From the article:
And as a young millennial/old gen Z guy, I can switch networks with ease because I just don’t personally have any network to lose! I didn’t have any friends on Reddit when I left! And when I left Facebook, I only ever kept in close contact with two people.
Considering the history of the world and the fact that our species is a social one, I don’t think that people clinging to their social network is worth classifying to be an addictive or emotionally reliant behavior. I can tell you from personal experience: not having a social network is a fast-track to a difficult life.
Right, so people leaving a social network would have to reintegrate into some in-person social network. That is seen as a cost to leave their current network.
Literally unless you want to just be alone all your life (which is fine and frankly I sympathize, hence why I’m not making friends on enshittified social networks), you need to go where the people are, even if it sucks, even and especially to do real things in the real world.
This is a great breakdown. Its much like my peers who never left FB: they simply stand to lose the majority of their social exposure that is not work related.
Pick one. It’s either an addiction OR a choice