• Lemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Well, that’s hard to do when your government are the only ones with guns and power.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Innocent lives lost due to “law abiding citizens” mishandling guns: a metric shit ton

      Corrupt governments toppled by gun lovers: 0

      The thought of how many people might be stocking ammo and thinking to use out if their favorite politician loses makes me happy for having an ocean between me and them.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You don’t understand. They mean they want to topple democratic societies in favor of theocratic fascism.

        Peace is the enemy.

        These fuckers never stopped waging the civil war, that’s what this is about and was ever all about.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Corrupt governments toppled by gun lovers: 0

        i mean, in a sense. That is why the US exists today. The british are well known gun fanatics.

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ahh, the typical Reddit old tradition of vague statement of knowledge with no meat to not be rebutted. Had hoped that didn’t reach Lemmy.

          Lightning round. Russia? Ha! China? Ha! North Korea? Japan? Ha! Netherlands? Hahahaha

          USA…? Hahahahahahhahahhaha

      • Lemmy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        8 months ago

        What about the innocent lives lost because they didn’t have a gun? You think everyone can fight with their bare hands or a knife?

        • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Owning a gun makes you more likely to die by gun accident or by that gun being used against you. You logic is completely wrong.

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You think these people care about logic? Wait until you hear who they are voting for and their reasoning for it.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Who do you even need to fight bro? If I was say getting mugged I would give them all my valuables save a 10 % tip that I could give them when I was allowed to run the hell away from there. Do not be a stupid macho idiot. Be a smart coward without neither a wallet, gun nor a fatal wound.

          Jokes aside, the main uptick is the smaller chance of someone less mentally stable than you with less to lose also having a gun.

          • Lemmy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            So what about when you are getting raped? What about when someone doesn’t want to let you go? Do you know what its like to almost be murdered?

            If you want to say “Why do you even need to fight bro” you’re basically just saying good luck to all the people who can’t defend themselves and just letting them die. And do you not understand how regimes come to light? Just take a look at Russia, Putin just got to serve for another 6 years. Do you wonder how somebody stays in power for 24 years and more? Because nobody can fight back.

            • current@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Russia has pretty high gun ownership… comparable to Europe/Australia and not far from Canada. The US has like 4x the guns per capita as the next highest countries, and it’s far from the most free.

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          If a country like the US had a lower violent dead per capita than other first world countries like France or Germany, I would agree with you. But given that the numbers are 3 to 6 times those of EU countries, it doesn’t seem to be working.

          Still, if you want to quantify how many lives were saved in any given year I can give you how many innocent ones were lost. Hard to measure, you say? Then it’s a weak arguments based on feelings not facts.

          • bcoffy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If a country like the US had a lower violent dead per capita than other first world countries like France or Germany, I would agree with you.

            It doesn’t have as high of a gun ownership rate as the US (no one does), but Czechia has some of the laxest gun laws in Europe, including allowing the concealed carry of a handgun like the US (at least 1 million Czechs have permits to own a firearm, a large portion of which conceal carry them for self defense) and they have a lower homicide rate than Germany or France (Source: World Bank)

            Even as a supporter of gun rights, I don’t think that definitively proves that guns, on a societal level, prevent deaths. I don’t believe that in general. I do believe, however, that on a personal level, a well trained individual who sees the need to defend themself or people they love can prevent harm by owning a firearm. I do also believe that in a society (America) with a broken policing system, and an increasingly authoritarian Republican party that wants to crack down on my rights and the rights of people I love, I’d like the option to protect myself and my friends/family.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The more knives people use, the more people get cut.

              More guns = more gun violence.

              How fucking hard is that to comprehend?

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            “We have dug this hole for ourselves so deep we can’t get out of it. At this point our chances are better if we keep digging straight down, it has to bottom out somewhere, right?”

            / The words of a truly dying society

      • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        I struggle to see Japan as a bastion of freedom lol. Fun place to visit for sure, but between the archaic drug laws and suicide forests I’m not sure they are a society others should be modeling themselves after.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s better when it’s the government with guns against criminals, randos, and children with guns.

      More guns is always the solution. If it only causes more violence and bloodshed like a tribal civil war in the jungle then you clearly did not get enough guns.

      Plus, they’re FUN! People forget that it’s FUN to shoot guns. Isn’t that worth a dysfunctional society crippled by violence and murder?