• Nora@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You dont have to go faster than light to get to another star. It’s not easy but you couldn’t possibly imagine a billion years of technological development.

    • HyonoKo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about those generational ships with closed ecosystems where people live and inbreed for hundreds of years until they reach another system?

      • collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean to say millions of years. The tech needed to accelerate enough to make the trip in hundreds of years is also far outside the realm of physics as we know it

        • Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The orion drive is basically an engineering challenge. Very little new tech required. It could reach nearby stars in hundreds of years with no new physics.

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem isn’t travel time, it’s speed. Space itself is continuing to expand, at a faster and faster rate. It’s expanding so fast that we’ll actually never reach far out with conventional means. We’d just endlessly drift through the darkness because we wouldn’t be able to go fast enough to reach anything. A generation ship would simply not be able to get anywhere, ever.

        I mean, maybe we can make it into another very close system, but what are the chances that there’s anything even close to being habitable?

        • svellere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          On a local level the expansion of space cannot overcome gravitational attraction to a certain scale, roughly around the size of our local galaxy cluster. We’ll always be able to reach anything in our local galaxy cluster without FTL travel.

        • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your sense of scale is off. The amount of stuff held together by local group gravity is more than we can ever get bored with.

          The amount things that we can reach without FTL is so large that humans could explore and colonize for billions of years without ever feeling like we are running out of space.

        • Nora@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Our galaxy is not ripping apart yet. And our galaxy is moving closer to several others. You can certainly get to other stars without FTL

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      if we started now we would have a billion year head start. we can play the tortoise in this race.

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if ftl is fully off the table, a billion years of technology advancement is a… Lot. Like, we could probably just make a new sun at that point.

      Not saying it’s likely, the likely outcome is we go extinct because of our own dumb stuff