neptune@dmv.social to Star Wars Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoPraise bedmv.socialimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1545arrow-down125
arrow-up1520arrow-down1imagePraise bedmv.socialneptune@dmv.social to Star Wars Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareChetzemoka@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up67arrow-down1·1 year agoExcept for the part in prophecy where Jesus is specifically described as being unattractive lol “He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.” https://web.mit.edu/jywang/www/cef/Bible/NIV/NIV_Bible/ISA+53.html#:~:text=He had no beauty or,that we should desire him.&text=He was despised and rejected,and we esteemed him not.
minus-squareeestileib@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·1 year agoHair was also curlier, like lamb’s wool. He could probably have had some decent dreads.
minus-squareChetzemoka@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoGiven his association with the wild preacher, John the Baptist, he very well might have
minus-squareHeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI thought those passages meant he had back hair you could get lost in for days but I’m no religious scholar
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNow that ties on with the absence of bueaty!
minus-squareMatthew@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoMaybe that’s why Jews don’t believe him to be the messiah — he was too damn hot.
minus-squareneptune@dmv.socialOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·1 year agoI don’t see any reason to take the term “beauty” here in a modern sense. If that is the game we are playing here.
minus-squareours@lemmy.filmlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoFlashback to that mustachioed Persian princess “beauty”.
Except for the part in prophecy where Jesus is specifically described as being unattractive lol
“He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.” https://web.mit.edu/jywang/www/cef/Bible/NIV/NIV_Bible/ISA+53.html#:~:text=He had no beauty or,that we should desire him.&text=He was despised and rejected,and we esteemed him not.
Hair was also curlier, like lamb’s wool.
He could probably have had some decent dreads.
Given his association with the wild preacher, John the Baptist, he very well might have
I thought those passages meant he had back hair you could get lost in for days but I’m no religious scholar
Now that ties on with the absence of bueaty!
Maybe that’s why Jews don’t believe him to be the messiah — he was too damn hot.
I don’t see any reason to take the term “beauty” here in a modern sense. If that is the game we are playing here.
Flashback to that mustachioed Persian princess “beauty”.