• latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If I remember correctly, one such example is the lightbulb. Some of the earliest designs were centered around using longer-lasting filaments than their contemporary counterparts, which meant considerably increased lifespan.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sure, but those kinds of lights are very dim. You can just use a dimmer bulb set to very low if you want that kind of longevity.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s only because that light has been running non-stop, and at very low power. It’s the on/off cycles that kills the filament.

        Plus, the whole “they used to make stuff to last” thing is just survivorship bias. They absolutely made garbage products in the past, but those didn’t survive.

        Plus, most things like appliances were major purchases. People today don’t want to/can’t drop the equivalent of $400 on a toaster or $3k on a washing machine.

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ah, but that’s just it, lightbulbs were the beginning of enshittification. Once lightbulb manufacturers realized people weren’t coming back to buy more bulbs very often, they started deliberately making them to burn out a bit faster, to make them more of a consumable product.

          Do note, there’s a difference between a conspiracy theory and an actual conspiracy. This actually happened yo, and we’re still suffering with this sort of deliberately short lived shit today…

          https://youtu.be/ulUI7JsFjZU

          • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            With light bulbs, there is a trade off between longevity and efficiency.

            Efficient shorter lasting bulbs are the superior product, they save the consumer money (at the expense of the inconvenience of having to replace them a little more often)

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Meanwhile, after they mastered the process of making LEDs, they were quoted to have a half life of around 400 years, meaning that after 400 years continuous use, they’d be expected to emit about half as much light as they did new.

              Now what did they go and do? They ramped up the power and made them blindingly bright, yet only last like 5 years or so, if you’re lucky.

              And the cycle of enshittification continues…

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They still made them too. 130V bulbs / garage bulbs / heavy duty bulbs all lasted far longer on 120V because the filament was thicker. They basically never went out.