• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Or just the form of a crab in general! Carcinisation is so weird, but apparently evolution sometimes goes “Let’s just do crab again, that shit was 👌”.

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Windows Control Panel. Everything’s there, multiple ways to sort it all, no need to go shake things up

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      33 minutes ago

      Ah yes. Perfection:

      Or maybe:

      No? maybe this.

      Edit I missed windows XP

      No shakeups at all, it’s like a rock.

      Perfectly reliable and unchanged from the beginning.

      Edit since folks choose to distinguish “Settings” from “Control Panel” as if that doesn’t make the point even stronger. I’ll admit that it’s been pretty consistent since Windows 7. Still very different than the first iteration.

      • _bcron_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Well, the last 2 images you linked are Settings and not Control Panel, from versions that decided to not only have that but also the Control Panel, and Control Panel is thematically the same across all versions

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          That makes it worse! Clearly they did not get it right the first time around, or there wouldn’t be any reason to tweak and replace it all constantly.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Control panel is that drawer of tools, tape, rubber bands, and glue that’s near the kitchen

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oh hell no. You don’t remember it coming out and everyone complaining about how convoluted it was. Pepperidge farm remembers.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        People complained that a few things were hard to find, but not that the control panel itself was convoluted.

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If I remember correctly, one such example is the lightbulb. Some of the earliest designs were centered around using longer-lasting filaments than their contemporary counterparts, which meant considerably increased lifespan.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Sure, but those kinds of lights are very dim. You can just use a dimmer bulb set to very low if you want that kind of longevity.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s only because that light has been running non-stop, and at very low power. It’s the on/off cycles that kills the filament.

        Plus, the whole “they used to make stuff to last” thing is just survivorship bias. They absolutely made garbage products in the past, but those didn’t survive.

        Plus, most things like appliances were major purchases. People today don’t want to/can’t drop the equivalent of $400 on a toaster or $3k on a washing machine.

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ah, but that’s just it, lightbulbs were the beginning of enshittification. Once lightbulb manufacturers realized people weren’t coming back to buy more bulbs very often, they started deliberately making them to burn out a bit faster, to make them more of a consumable product.

          Do note, there’s a difference between a conspiracy theory and an actual conspiracy. This actually happened yo, and we’re still suffering with this sort of deliberately short lived shit today…

          https://youtu.be/ulUI7JsFjZU

          • TwentySeven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            With light bulbs, there is a trade off between longevity and efficiency.

            Efficient shorter lasting bulbs are the superior product, they save the consumer money (at the expense of the inconvenience of having to replace them a little more often)

            • over_clox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Meanwhile, after they mastered the process of making LEDs, they were quoted to have a half life of around 400 years, meaning that after 400 years continuous use, they’d be expected to emit about half as much light as they did new.

              Now what did they go and do? They ramped up the power and made them blindingly bright, yet only last like 5 years or so, if you’re lucky.

              And the cycle of enshittification continues…

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They still made them too. 130V bulbs / garage bulbs / heavy duty bulbs all lasted far longer on 120V because the filament was thicker. They basically never went out.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I fixed a bent iPad 2 using a rubber mallet and a short piece of wood on a good flat wooden bench. Hey, I didn’t feel like busting out the heat gun and all that nonsense for the glued on touchscreen just for a bent metal frame, so I took a chance.

    At worst, the touchscreen might have broke in the process, but that would have only set me back $7 and an extra 45 minutes. But it worked perfectly, flattened out correctly, didn’t break anything, and I got to go to lunch like 45 minutes early.

    I don’t recommend this approach though.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why would a touch screen have only set you back 7 bucks? Is that how much they cost for phone repair shops?

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        At the time, for the iPad 2, yes. The touchscreen is not sealed to the LCD on the iPad 2, it’s only glued to the edges of the frame with double sided tape.

        Neither part was broke, it was just that the frame was slightly bent by the volume buttons, jamming one of the buttons in. It was such a subtle bend that I really didn’t see any good reason to go through all the trouble of disassembly, as even that risks breaking the touchscreen.

    • Che Banana@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      My kitchen must have is an analog clock.

      Years of training and using it daily, never wore a watch and don’t give a shit what time it is when I am out of the kitchen.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Was only a few years ago I realized that the minute hand is entirely superfluous for most applications. You can easily tell what ten minute interval of the day you are in by looking only at the hour hand.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        On a large enough clock, the hour hand could have easily visible marks for not just minutes, but also seconds. If I were an architect or whatever I would try to make that the floor of a lobby or something.