• It’s chromium, it does that ambient color changing shit I hate, it “anticipates my needs” instead of just waiting my my instruction. This is a browser designed to make me angry.

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried it for a bit, even daily drove it on my laptop for a while. It has a pretty slick interface, and uses containers so you could, for example, have one container that you are logged into your google account for (say, Youtube), and the rest of your containers you can not log into Google.

      The downside is that 1) It’s still not mature as of a month ago. They are making massive changes and adding new features constantly, and 2) It’s still Chromium, so all of the downsides of that are still present.

      If they switch to using Firefox or another open-source foundation, I’d be all over it.

      • otacon239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox already has containers. I still have yet to see a browser that beats stock Firefox in functionality, customization and privacy

          • otacon239@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is the key. There are a few projects that can beat it in one way or another, but not all 3. Every project that beats FF in a functional way ends up sacrificing privacy. And those that somehow beat it in privacy are underdeveloped and run into weird compatibility issues or are missing support for key plugins.

            • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Chrome is run by a massive corporation with a reputation for for invasions of privacy. Opera is run by a nation state with a reputation for invasions of privacy.

              Vivaldi is far better than either of those.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why they target Apple users. They don’t understand what closed source means, nor care. They just want flashy new thing.

          • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Safari is a very thin set of changes to WebKit, you can just run & build WebKit nightlies, which I do for web dev, so I don’t screw up my main browser. You have zero idea what you’re talking about, you just read a wiki page.

            Macs let you run anything you want, obviously. iOS does, too, as long as you’re a developer sideloading. People who can’t hit compile shouldn’t be allowed to run random shit on their phones which are 2FA etc. keys.

            • On@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Safari is a very thin set of changes to WebKit, you can just run & build WebKit nightlies,

              you don’t seem to understand software licenses, so please stop overselling yourself. Just because a software uses open source code, it doesn’t automatically become open-source. You’re first claim was Safari is open-source. It’s not

              and compiling a browser for webdev. lol

  • Eddie@lemmy.lucitt.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thought I’d throw my opinion into the ring here, since literally every comment is shitting on this.

    Arc is a design project, that also happens to be a web browser. If you’re just calling this “another chromium fork”, I think you’re completely missing the point of who this product is for. First of all, it’s not for you.

    Secondly, the design changes that arc is working on perfecting are pretty groundbreaking. The ability to customize the css and functionality of any web page without code and it saves your profiles for future use with a marketplace is super interesting to me. So much UI on modern websites is entirely unnecessary. As a designer, this is a dream.

    Also, nobody is mentioning that their working on a Windows version THAT NATIVELY RUNS SWIFT ON WINDOWS. This is a big deal for future cross compatibility in general, why are so many people not looking at this?

    Anyway that’s my rant. Trying to voice my opinions even if they’re the odd ones out to prevent a Lemmy based echo chamber. Feel free to disagree.

    • pkulak@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well why didn’t you say we get cool trinkets and shiny doodads?! That’s totally worth handing control over the entire internet to a single corporation.

    • On@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ability to customize the css and functionality of any web page without code

      Isn’t that something other browsers have been able to do for ages with add-ons like stylus, greasemonkey and others. it doesn’t seem all that groundbreaking.

      People might be hesitant to download a different browser what they can accomplish with a simple addon.

    • halva@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      what’s the big deal about swift?? the language has been cross-platform for quite some time now, it’s just there wasn’t much point for it on neither windows nor linux outside of “oh look i can write a hello world in swift”

      good on them for utilizing it but I don’t think it’s revolutionary or anything

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole problem is that the free internet is dying because google is starting to get a monopoly over it.

      So, yes, “just another Chromium browser” is a very valid criticism, because it quite literally aids in jeopardizing the future of the internet.

  • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just chrome with different pitched bells and whistles.

    Give me some WebKit based alternatives or something interesting…

  • dinckelman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve attempted to understand what makes this browser good, time after time, and I still just don’t get it. They claim that they’ve ripped out the UI and created it from scratch, to improve workflow and how we approach browsers, but it’s done nothing but infuriate me, because they just built a gesture based interface with layers upon layers of hidden stuff, none of which is intuitive, and it’s for the desktop. Not to mention the other blunders with their extensions

    • Dalinar@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can download the Mac binary on Linux or Windows

      You can’t do anything with it but it’s technically correct… the best type of correct.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just downloaded to confirm if it still requires signing up for an account to use it (I was on the wait list and ditched it immediately because of this). It still does. I’m ditching it immediately.

      I may be a browser whore, always trying anything new, but fuck that. Make it optional for sync and such but lemme use it without signing into your service to see if I want to do so first.

      If you feel the same, you aren’t missing much.

      • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would consider downloading it if only for testing since I work in SaaS, but a browser, Apple only, subscription based?

        That’s an edge case I don’t need to consider.

        “Unsupported Browser” is the only effort I need to put into it.

  • Aatube@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it just me, or is all they’ve done to move everything to the left sidebar and use macOS’s UI widgets?

  • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    anyone

    Lol, it’s just on mac. No windows version or even plans for a Linux one. Not that I’d use another chromium fork.

  • ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If this browser is as slow as their website, I can’t say it’s looking too good. It also appears to be just another Chromium browser, because I guess we needed more of those. And it appears to be closed source. Hard pass. ~Strawberry

    Edit: No plans for a Linux port and they’re planning on shoehorning A"I" into it. I hate it already.

    • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It uses whatever rending engine works best on the platform you’re using - Chromium’s main advantage is the extensive plugin library so that’s the one they use on most platforms, though they have said they have internal builds that run on other rending engines and those work fine (except for plugins). If there’s every any reason to drop Chromium they will.

      As for being “just another” anything - it really isn’t. The way tabs work is fundamentally different to any other browser. At a glance, it just looks like a basic browser with tabs in the sidebar instead of across the top but it’s so much more than that.

      For example most browser have three types of tab - Regular, Pinned, and Incognito. Arc has “Today” tabs, Pinned Tabs, Favourite Tabs (these are closer to “Pinned” tabs in other browsers), “Little” tabs, Split tabs, Popup Tabs, and Incognito tabs.

      Notice there is no “regular” on that list - none of the tabs in Arc behave like a regular browser tab. Arc also doesn’t have bookmarks - tabs replace bookmarks. Here’s the breakdown:

      • Today tabs go away at the end of the day (you can change this to be longer, I don’t recommend doing that). They go into an Archive and can easily be recovered.
      • Pinned tabs aren’t like pinned tabs are synced between all your devices/browser windows and they stick around until you get rid of them. The process to create and remove a pinned tab is really simple and they are organised in groups and folders. Pinned tabs won’t necessarily bne running in RAM, so in a way they’re almost like a bookmark.
      • Favorite tabs appear as just an icon instead of a full tab, and they appear in all of your groups (within a profile). They are also pre-loaded — handy for web apps that take a while to load.
      • A Little tab tab doesn’t have tabs - it harkens back to the old days when the web was a lot simpler. It’s useful for quickly looking something up and then closing it a few seconds later. Links from other apps open in this mode by default.
      • Split tabs are a single tab that contains multiple webpages - e.g. you might have your zoom meeting and your notes as a single tab.
      • Popup tabs are similar to “little” tabs, except instead of being in a separate window they are embedded in a tab. If you have, for example, your issue tracker as a pinned tab, and you load up a link to a different domain name, it will open in one of these. You can go back to your issue tracker by closing the popup tab instead of hitting the back button six times… but it will still be a single tab for both your issue tracker and the link that the issue tracker took you to.
      • Incognito works the same as any other browser.

      Yes - it is closed source… but it uses an unmodified open source rendering engine and for me that’s good enough.