There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    long past their capability to actually run the updated software

    Well, Apple intentionally slowed those devices down to make the users update, instead of using an insecure device, that would’ve provided a good experience otherwise.

    And these days Apple is retiring devices arbitrarily for profits too. For example this year they are retiring the Iphone 8, which has better hardware, than the ipad 2018 that is still being supported…

    • bedrooms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That slowness was, at least officially, for the battery health. Do you have the support to prove otherwise?

      • Boiscull@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then if I recall correctly (though I can’t be bothered to look) didn’t they get sued for slowing phones?

        So people were mad that their phones battery wasn’t holding a charge anymore, “im being forced to upgrade”, so Apple throttled older phones to keep the battery running, aka allowing people to keep their phones longer, and then they got sued for slowing down phones lol.

        I am an apple fan boy, I wont hide that. But it does seem like they tried to do a “good” and make peoples phones last longer, and then got sued.

        Also the whole forced upgrade just isn’t apples game IMO. Do they want you buying the new one every year, of course. But the more important thing is that you keep using AN iPhone at all. Stay in the ecosystem, stay in the app store, stay paying for icloud, etc.

        Going to a new phone gives the user a window to move away from IOS. (Though most won’t haha)