Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion
Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion
🤩
More than enough for MX Linux with Xfce. But it’s not going to make your applications a whole lot faster.
They stand to gain nothing from making a proprietary platform
Why would that be possible? Wouldn’t the developer have their server rejected any calls from “unsigned” apps?
Did those using tutor AI spend less time on learning? That would have been worth measuring
This is probably makes a good case for open sourcing all governing algorithms
Very true because the relationship they have with laptop manufacturers will ensure windows domination
You’re right, there’s no point in general public following these news. When a lab publishes such, it’s meant for other researchers. The other researchers can try to build upon. It might become useful or as an inventor put it - discover a thousand ways of how not to do it.
When you see big numbers reported but see the deployed improvements in single digits, that’s coz the big number improvement gets deployed many years later.
I meant LCDs can have it too
LCDs have that
Ummm, yeah, that’s the real difference between level 2 and 3 - who is liable
Your guess is bad and you should feel bad.
That’s what I thought too and had a good chuckle. But from the comments, it didn’t seem so.
Are you saying man pages are bad or are you mocking those who don’t use it?
If you think that by working more hours, your salary would increase overall, you’re wrong. Have some basic understanding of game theory, microeconomics and worker solidarity.
Stop working more you dipshits
Where’s I pirate coz it’s way more convenient?
That’s b2b business which apple and google don’t do. Or aren’t good at, at the very least.
Yep, they are not portable, every app should come bundled with its own interpreter. As to why, I think historically it didn’t target production grade application development.