It’s easy to support when Elon is the recipient, but is this a good precedent to set?
It’s easy to support when Elon is the recipient, but is this a good precedent to set?
Thanks for the offer, but I’ll support them from day one when I decide to subscribe :) I already know that several creators on Nebula make good content.
deleted by creator
Thanks for doing the legwork, I appreciate the initiative :) I’m guessing that I’ll end up with a Nebula subscription, I just haven’t pulled the trigger yet.
I’ve considered Nebula a few times. That could absolutely be the alternative I’m looking for if they keep adding creators and topics and variety.
I desperately want a viable alternative to come along. There’s a lot of great content on YouTube, but the platform is increasingly being enshitified.
Absolutely. Improvements has been made, but there is a very long way to go.
Yes. The owners are already wealthier when they buy an EV, and thus they already have the higher carbon footprint. This is not caused by the EV.
But an EV has a significantly higher carbon footprint than public transport, though.
No, it is not. But, while electric vehicles have lower carbon footprint than gasoline powered cars, they have far higher carbon footprint than public transport.
”The researchers found that people who purchase EVs tend to be wealthier than average”
TMDB (https://www.themoviedb.org/) maybe? Don’t think it has an app though.
Ad hoc weapons (Vjatsjeslav Mikhajlovitsj Molotov)?
Factual reporting and they have no story. Create sensationalism out of nothing/little and they get clicks.
They push as far as they can. As long as people are willing to pay they’ll keep vying for our incomes. Cancelled subscriptions is the only language they understand.
Pro: the second line can be deactivated (“disconnected”) from the phone. Con: added cost.
I agree. It would set a terrible precedent, even if it’s terribly tempting. I’d say it’s better to ask people to leave instead.
The AI version of mad cow disease.