Linux has full time developers. Blender has full time developers. Lots of other projects have full time developers. They still don’t sell my data to Google.
A web browser is a very visible piece of software, relied upon by end users, businesses and governments alike. I’m sure enough people and organizations would donate their time and money to fund this, if it existed.
You said:
Again, no, that’s not true. This API is only used by sites that opt into it, and in so doing, they are disabling the normal tracking which is far more invasive.
OK, your source for this:
A full version of an in-browser attribution API will offer strong privacy protections, while providing considerable flexibility in how to measure ad performance. Our long term goal is a standardized attribution solution. We believe that a good attribution system will give advertising businesses a real alternative to more objectionable practices, like tracking, which should allow browsers to further restrict those practices.
Nowhere does it say websites are disabling other tracking methods.
It says that browsers could (maybe, in the future) restrict other methods of tracking, if this gets widespread mainstream adoption. Why are these things related exactly? Mozilla could presumably implement these tracking restrictions right now. The reason they are related in the minds and PR of Mozilla drones is that they don’t dare do this without providing an alternative for the ad industry. Their corporate overlords won’t “allow” it.
But right now, this restricts and replaces nothing, they literally are giving you vague promises about future improvements, while already collecting your data, like I said.
I will remind you that you accused others of spreading misinformation in this thread. I will accept your little mea culpa song and dance now. Gimme!
Can you imagine a world where Linux wasn’t directly getting paid by Amazon to hook all your machines up to AWS? You can’t! And how could vim possibly be developed without dropbox integration and sponsorship, that would never work. There is no way a world exists where Krita doesn’t sell all your drawings to OpenAI, how are they going to make any money?
None of these nice things could exist if they weren’t selling out their users, that’s just reality.
I can’t find this in the announcements and stuff. Where does it say that exactly?
Where does it say that? How would this be enforced?
This API instead
Instead of what? As I said, this is in addition to existing tracking, with some vague promise that if current tracking methods were banned or abandoned, this could be used instead. Except it’s not getting banned (Mozilla is not going to out-lobby Google) or abandoned (market forces prevent that), and why oh why would I want some alternative way for ad companies to get my data in that situation anyway? Let them die.
Now if another person is going to repeat this nonsense talking point, which you have picked up strait from Mozilla’s corporate PR, I’m going to lose my mind. Have some critical thinking skills. They are giving away your data right now and they give you nothing in return except a nonsense promise of a fairytale future.
Please I just want a browser that acts in the user’s interest only, does not work with Meta on adtech, and does not think it’s their duty to save the ad industry from itself.
Ah yes, the hypothetical second step, in which tracking is going to be outlawed (I’m not holding my breath), except, of course, for the third party services that do the aggregating, which will “sell” (literal quote) the aggregate data, so I guess these are by semantic sophistry not adtech companies but something else.
I’m so glad this genius “plan” can be used to justify Mozilla funneling data to adtech firms right now, because in some hypothetical future timeline this somehow can be construed with a bunch of hand-waving and misdirection to be in my interest.
How about instead we have a browser that only cares about the users, and not give a fuck about adtech? Its number one goal should be to treat adtech as hostile, and fight to ruin that whole industry.
This does not prevent regular ad tracking, this provides additional data to advertisers. It also means Mozilla is now tracking me, and then Mozilla does this “anonymizing” on their servers. I do not trust Mozilla with this data, and I don’t trust that no way can be found de-anonymize or combine this data with other data ad networks already collect.
This is not in my interest at all. This data should not be collected. The ad networks can suck it, why should I help them?
https://blog.privacyguides.org/2024/07/14/mozilla-disappoints-us-yet-again-2/
OK glad you found some workaround!
Since when is aluminium biologically important? I’m under the impression that humans (and other life?) do not need aluminium at all.
Having said that, my info is that it’s nothing to worry about. It is very common in food (naturally and since forever), and the body can get rid of it, and they haven’t been able to show adverse effects except in very very high doses. That’s the messaging I’ve been seeing anyway.
It actually starts, and then turns off. I didn’t notice it before you drew my attention.
That does sound like DPMS (“vesa display power management signaling”) shenanigans though.
Maybe you can disable XFCE’s display power management stuff completely? Systemd’s logind (/etc/systemd/logind.conf) can do (and does by default I think) suspend on lid-close without any window manager involvement at all, works fine with i3 here. So disabling XFCE’s stuff probably “only” messes with your monitor not going standby after a while, and you can maybe use xset or xscreensaver and set this by hand (after making sure it’s actually properly disabled in XFCE, so XFCE doesn’t override that stuff).
Found this about how to stop xfce4-power-manager and disable DPMS:
xfce4-power-manager -q
xset -dpms
Try doing that and see if lid close works afterwards.
Since that bug seems related to the X server somehow, I wonder if your monitor is showing black or actually off/standby (as in backlight off)?
If it’s the backlight, maybe it’s related to DPMS (monitor power management), and you can jolt it back to life with something like
xset dpms force on
after waking up. Or maybe disable DPMS completely and see if that changes anything.
It would also be interesting to know if this problem also happens outside of XFCE. If you just use (say) openbox (which I don’t think does any power management or DPMS stuff by itself), does that work?
Btw, based on the name, and looking at the source, I think this block-rate-estim is a benchmark helper program for the libde265 video decoder. I think it takes in a file with log data (like debug output or something) and does some statistical calculation on it. My guess is the “block rate” is the speed/throughput.
It’s not available on Debian here (not part of any package, i.e. not installed/compiled, not sure why Fedora Arch would include this in the package tbh), since I think it’s supposed to be an internal dev tool or something like that.
It expects two arguments: a tag (whatever that is) and a filename for input data. It definitely doesn’t understand --help and I suspect it endlessly loops when it doesn’t get valid filename as the second argument.
I’m sticking to my hunch from my other comment, that it is one of your vim (or maybe shell) plugins. It possibly runs every binary installed on your system with --help, to provide some sort of autocomplete or something like that. If that is the case, that seems like a bad idea honestly.
I see no reason why FreeTube would run this, but if it did, it surely wouldn’t incorrectly run it with just --help as an argument.
Maybe you have some sort of auto-completion plugin that attempts to parse --help output? And that particular binary doesn’t understand --help probably.
Maybe try running pstree to see who spawns that process?
I know gv can auto-reload, though not sure if it’s any faster or less flickery than evince or mupdf. Maybe worth testing.
Two things, yes. I can’t be trusted to time anything by myself just by looking at the clock, and you often have multiple things cooking at the same time.
GUI toolkits like Qt and Gtk. I can’t tell you how to do it better, but something is definitely wrong with the standard class hierarchy framework model these things adhere to. Someday someone will figure out a better way to write GUIs (or maybe that already exists and I’m unaware) and that new approach will take over eventually, and all the GUI toolkits will have to be scrapped or rewritten completely.
A measuring jug (from oxo) that allows you to see the marks when looking at it from above.
Also I have two timers, and I need and use both.
If you install (well more like unpack) Firefox from the official binary tarball, that will update itself.