Wow you’re insane. “I know, I’ll discredit the woman who just pointed out that it’s hard to get credit in her field as a woman ”
Wow you’re insane. “I know, I’ll discredit the woman who just pointed out that it’s hard to get credit in her field as a woman ”
Weird how he’s helping the far right in both cases.
Python is just glorified shell scripting
Absolutely not, python is an actual programming language with sane error handling and arbitrarily nestable data structures.
I don’t like the indentation crap
Don’t be so superficial. When learning something, go with the flow and try to work with the design choices, not against them.
Python simply writes a bit differently: you do e.g. more function definitions and list comprehensions.
Not only is there a UInt8Array, there’s also a bunch of others: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/TypedArray#typedarray_objects
Once git no longer depends on it, it’ll be gone from my system
Nah, gross. You need to set a bunch of global options to get sane behavior on errors.
Nushell is shaping up really really nicely, and it’ll actually stop executing if something fails! Even if that happens in a pipe! And it’s not super eager to convert between arrays and strings if you use the wrong cryptic rune.
Did you know that you can click the headline to get to an actual article that you can read, which answers this question?
Big difference between the pro and consumer versions though. Which ones are you referring to?
Very true. I doubt the researcher in question would object to use a virus scanner like you described.
Every consumer antivirus software works like the black box rootkit you described, AFAIK.
Totally reasonable to not do a dumb thing if you have no contractual obligation to do the dumb thing.
Sadly they had that obligation, so they have to weigh the cost of doing the dumb thing with the cost of breaching contract.
No, that’s not the take-away.
Going without AV as a computer-savvy person is perfectly reasonable, as AV companies can’t be trusted, and AVs are notorious for having deep seated privileges and bad security themselves – therefore increasing your attack surface.
The take-away is that if you’re deciding for an institution that’s contractually obligated to do a thing, you should do it.
It’s not perfect, but it’s good introductory material for people who fell for the right-wing propaganda of “everybody’s called a fascist now, there isn’t even a definition”.
Yes, suckers, there are people with an understanding of what fascism is, and they agree for a reason about the dangers of things like calling people vermin, casting doubt on election integrity, and strong man rhetoric.
Almost as if he is one and the definitions agree for a reason.
Yeah, the Nazis weren’t really subtle. If you instead maintain a civil front inward for public support, you can wreak havoc more effectively.
That’s why fascism is a different kind of danger. It wouldn’t leech off of other places for centuries, it would explosively and directly attack internal and external enemies.
Neither of these things can be risked.
Yes, that’s why I wrote the part after “I see what you’re getting at”
Fascism is a pretty specific ideology. If you want to learn more, Umberto Eco made a list.
I get where you’re getting at: the role of past and ongoing colonialism is still being downplayed. But you’re wrong. There are very good reasons why we should fear fascism in particular.
That’s more like
Dun dun dun dun din dun din
din dun din
din dun din
dun dun dun dun din dun din diii din dun dun dun din
I mean, if you treat your inbox as a to-do list, that’s not that far-fetched