• 1 Post
  • 170 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 23rd, 2024

help-circle



  • You know, Java interop is actually a good thing.

    I’ve used a few dozen languages, and noticed that most modern languages lack libraries. Coming from Python and C++ I often feel it that way. Use whatever niche language and I’ll hit the lack of power options like Python’s pandas, databases, GUIs, etc.

    Clojure’s a powerful language, but with the size if its community there’s no hope of getting many alternatives on doing SQLs, for example. But, Java interop assures me I can just keep going with clojure, because I can almost always work around library issues with Java. It doesn’t even matter if I’m on a mac or ARM or 64bit (looking at you, C#).




  • eveninghere@beehaw.orgtoLinux@lemmy.mlopen letter to the NixOS foundation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Someone has to rewrite this…

    You have to read thousands of words past Executive Summary to see what’s going on, which eventually turns out to be the usual left-right culture war (aargh…) The worst is that this actual theme is hidden in the links and is never directly mentioned in the letter.

    The letter also stops short of taking side between left and right although the links clarify it’s obviously the former.

    It instead accuses the NixOS platform of having “systemic” problems in “leadership,” “structure,” etc. etc. I was like, “just say it, you simply believe in a more progressive NixOS team.”

    They only say “bad behaviors,” then define bad behaviors with abstract terms using one paragraph. That’s shortly after the text uses the metaphor of “missing stairs in a staircase”, without explaining what these missing stairs are about.

    So abstract, without examples for all this depth of abstraction.

    They go on with their “bad behavior”, bad behavior, bad behavior, and finally there are links. If you click on the first (?) of these links, you finally see that this one example was about minority representation in NixOS development. In the rest, you see examples of the usual conservative vs. progressive culture war.

    There are proper ways to do this.













  • This sounds like an exaggeration though.

    To me it seems like these researchers are saying the switch is confusing and complicated. That is not to say that Apple secretly collect data after lying to their users.

    The problem with Siri, first example, is more about Apple’s (characteristic) terminology garbage. Siri’s voice control has nothing to do with Siri’s search suggestion, yet they marketed both as Siri. Actually, you can turn them both off, but since the voice control is just called Siri, they confused their users.

    That’s different from "collecting data even when supposedly disabled.

    (Tbf, even if they were better termed, my mom would still manage to confuse herself… mo matter what Apple do, the average user won’t be able to turn off anything.)

    That said, there’s no point trying to convince someone on the internet anyway, and so I don’t really know why I wrote this comment.