So a .ML user posted a rant about bans, seemingly from real world establishments based on the wording, in a .ML group, and you felt it would make you seem normal to come in and take the opportunity to assume he was talking about .ML members being banned from other communities and to complain about .ML users?
Mirror.
“Skyrim? You mean stealth archer simulator?”
Me and who? (I’ll be the bear)
I thought Futurama ended years ago there’s new seasons!?
The social contract
and the knowledge that it isn’t acceptable
Rapists, well known followers of social contract who only do things that are acceptable…
It’s not concerning at all that this didn’t seem immensely silly and wrong when you typed it…
and any women inside would likely scream
Because if a bathroom allows trans women, women will then be unable to scream while facing an attempted rape?
the man would be perceived as an attempted rapist and would face consequences.
Are you advocating that any man who even accidentally enters a woman’s restroom startling a woman be declared an attempted rapists?
Otherwise, they will be considered an attempted rapist whether trans and allowed in the bathroom or not…when they start doing the attempted rape…
This is Puerto Rican erasure.
I disagree with this specific aspect. I believe there should be reasons required to ban someone. Not just because you own the place and don’t want them in your place as they make you/other customers uncomfortable.
As you state above, we have had to add protections for certain groups in the past as this is literally the justification for segregation in the past. But it’s still relevant as it’s the reason homeless people (for example) en masse aren’t allowed in public places in the present, even if they’re good people who have done nothing wrong. We also see it being abused with the allowance of a few “good ones” from said protected class to avoid discrimination claims while still discriminating against the rest of said class.