Whatever happened to copying isn’t stealing?
I think the crux of the conversation is whether or not the world is better with ChatGPT. I say yes. We can tackle the disinformation in another effort.
Whatever happened to copying isn’t stealing?
I think the crux of the conversation is whether or not the world is better with ChatGPT. I say yes. We can tackle the disinformation in another effort.
But that’s on the LLM side not the bot side.
Original Poster: person who submitted this to Lemmy
Original Original Poster: person who submitted the story to 4chan
Oops I installed Google photos and now my Gmail is full. Sooo dumb.
So it’s the seller’s responsibility to say “BTW I got this for free so you should pay me less” even if the product is of objective X quality?
All these comment chains are bonkers, yo.
Back to the main article, the entire point was supposed to be that the guy was making money by being a middle man that spent their time handling logistics in a way that made it worthwhile to acquire a thing and sell it to someone who felt they were getting a good deal. That’s much more value than “herp deep I’m a landlord, where’s my rent”.
“Using their privilege of being a coworker of someone who is in a position where it’s more valuable to them to give away furniture cuz it’s more annoying to sell it” is kind of a stretch. Not that it should matter but the vast majority of my shit was IKEA garbage from 11 years ago.
No I’m talking about making profit by acquiring something for less than it’s worth (the proof of this being that you are able to find someone who will pay more for it, during a short enough time frame that it is worth your time to do so)
People are quick to shit on real estate “investors”, this is kinda the same thing.
I moved recently and instead of dealing with the hassle of having to haggle, I decided to post on an internal company channel and give away all my stuff to coworkers. Since I was going to get charged for disposal, having a random unknown coworker (presumably a trusted person) come to my place and take away stuff for me for free was actually saving me money. Plus I don’t have to deal with actual strangers from Facebook who would probably try and haggle last minute. I got value out of that transaction.
But what if those coworkers sold my furniture instead of keeping it for themselves? Is that somehow dishonorable? What if someone decided to have their entire income be based off flipping furniture like this?
And if you’re OK with all of that, why not keep going and flip houses? It’s the same shit. You are not improving the product in any way (and sometimes house flippers do renovate). Or do things magically change because of the Barrier to entry?
Where do you draw the line between this and flipping houses?
“yes, please keep using Jenkins” -every red team ever
Apparently a condo is an apartment you own. So they’re buying an apartment complex wholesale and then selling (not renting) individual units.
Credit check
She now supports its removal, and IMO that’s the only reason it should be taken down.
Laughs in “I made an account on the NSFW instance”
Those are certainly rookie numbers.
That’s a great question. No way to tell. It’s freaking emoji.
A thumbs down could be displeasure of the product not being able to catch it, or it could be them not liking the comment because they think it’s untrue.
A fuzzer might catch the crashes related to the memory layout? But its purpose is to look for vulns not malice.
The dude himself is legit tho, he probably owns OSS Fuzz
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathan-metzman-b8892688
https://security.googleblog.com/2021/03/fuzzing-java-in-oss-fuzz.html
If your lack of belief in it changed the actual reality of things, I’m pretty sure that’d make you God.
That’s just the intermediate value theorem.
If we define the size of the Internet as a continuous function, and it started at zero and currently doesn’t fit in your phone then yeah, no shit, at some point it fit in your phone.
If it’s truly continuous there was an exact point where it would exactly fill up your phone with no room left over.
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/10667#pullrequestreview-1518981986
This person says OSS Fuzz would not have found it.
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/10667#pullrequestreview-1518981986
Looks like it was a cover up attempt to prevent manual attention and would not have been caught by the automation.
SolarWinds had garbage infosec but you gotta admit the attack chain is much longer and more complex than “kidnap one guy”.
How do you propose we meaningfully fix this issue? Hoping random people catch stuff doesn’t count.
They’re not selling the copy, bruh. They’re selling a technology that very few understand. Smart people pretend they get it, but they don’t. That’s how rare the math is.