ZFS ZIL will not help in this case.
ZFS ZIL will not help in this case.
Usually it can be solved by talking to hotel stuff. you are paying for that service and can expect it be suitable for any legal use.
Nope. You do not need physical access for it, just root access. and you HW is compromised with only means to recover it is SPI flashing of CPU.
3600 was released in 2019. And it they was making it for at least 2 years.
You need to be a root to exploit it, but if it get exploited any way to get rid of it is to throw MB to trash.
Why use SSD OS (unless he is using windows ). System can do to USB stick and rest od data to disk, and SSD may be a good option.
Does not really matter what wording they will put in. It is clear that project will go to pay or get nothing way. So just start working on decommissioning it. Free software really need better ways to pay developers, that will allow to avoid crap like that.
I would add LVM to the list of software raids, and remove btrfs as poorly engineered.
couple of old 2.5 HDD + usb to SATA converter. But Pi5 is hardly suitable to host anything. May just get old PC (which gives you HDD too). There are plenty for < $100 or even free. But you are going to pay more for power.
I do not see why it will cause any problems with exception of stacking mapping layer. I wonder can LVM do it natively without adding intermediate block device of 2 x 2G?
Depends what are you doing. Something like keep base os patched is pretty much nil efforts. Some apps more problematic than others. Home Assistant is always a pain to upgrade and something like postfix is requires nearly 0 maintenance.
circular dependency seems to be the case. I guess adding second external resolver to /etc/resolve.conf will help. Second entry will not be used unless first one ( pi-hole) is responding. But it need to be tested.
BTW, why do you want to send host’s DNS via pihole?
what exactly do you mena under subdomains?
Any DNS provider will support adding NS entries for subdomains if you want to host you sub-zone somwhere, And any should allow you to use names with “.” in it for “fake” subzone, like
a.subzone1 IN A x.x.x.x
a.subzone2 IN A y.y.y.y
nope, it is very deeply customized debian. Need to be installed from scratch.
Open source projects need to make money somehow. I found VyOS method quite acceptable. They giving good instruction and tools to build your own stable ISO. So do not be lazy or contribute somehow. Unfortunately their paid support costs too much. I was considering trying to push VyOS to be used as virtual router at my work, but it costs more than Cisco C8000v
Try VyOS. I run it on APU2 myself. No GUI no convolution.
Very strange line from specs.
USB Driver Windows XP/7/8/10/11, Linux (driver free on Raspberry Pi Raspbian system)
Does it mean binary blob driver only? and you need to pay for it to use it on PC?
If you still use HTTP for cert verification on ACME, you are doing it wrong. Use DNS-01 only, there is no need to allow any inbound traffic to your servers. and HTTP will not give you wildcard anyway.
using wildcards is really bad security practice. and at age of ACME absolutely unnecessary.
LE only certify your domain name, you may want to put more (like company name) to cert and it is where classic certs providers come to help.