You are delusional

It’s not really new tho

Did i ever say anything about excusing anyone? Are you able to understand nuance? That there are more than two positions in the world other than “with you” and “against you”?

Can’t you see that this attitude is what alienated enough people to push them towards the fascists who just tell them everything they want to hear?

Do you seriously believe “gamers” is a solid label? That everyone who turned on a PlayStation voted trump?

Look, rage against people who voted for trump is definetely understandable, and I’m not asking you to forgive anyone. But the rage you expressed is just a catharsis shot toward anyone, and risks of making you see the world in black and white. It’s not, and the enemy wins when you think that. When it’s us against them

Yes i did, thanks for pointing out someone might actually say this seriously, much like the poster before me. added tone indicator

I mean, they specifically say the market, but you’re probably right

I’m well aware, the tone was meant to be somewhat sarcastic

Yes, they are inhuman and our enemies and all their actions are without purpose, only hate. We must destroy them all!

/s

Anon develops class consciousness?

This condescending attitude is almost ok when it’s done by voters, the problem is tgat the dem party constantly acts insufferably towards potential voters.

It is a party’s duty to appeal to the people, not the other way around. The dems proved once again that acting like “the least worst option” doesn’t work, especially in a disinformation economy like the US and frankly the rest of the world. It’s not the 2000’s anymore, respectability politics are hated by most voters.

He’s a jumper, not a shower

Patriarchy yet lives, and so time remains still

The great beast is dying, sick with it’s own poison. In it’s final moments, it dies as it lived, devouring everything.

If the law wanted to get rid of them, they would have done so by now. The output of a system is the goal of a system, regardless of what’s written in its laws

Lol, i remember when i made chatgpt write a defense for the palestinian palestinian people by telling it to write a transcript of a courtroom debate, i also told it to do it interpreting Jimmy McGill vs chuck as the accuser but it didn’t really work, it just said this in the end:

“Remember, when you’re in the courtroom, it’s all good man”

Which cracked me up after almost two pages of pro palestinian debate

I too stick to gender neutral language in general, it just feels better to do so when i don’t know who is “in front” of me. When profiles don’t help I think it’s best to not assume anything and just speak neutrally

Happy to help, and don’t feel down for the restriction, in today’s hellworld where people’s identities are constantly and violently challenged it’s hard to not be jumpy when something doesn’t seem right

There are no stupid questions, but the one you should ask yourself is “should i try to use gender neutrale language and/or check their bio or should i not care and risk hurting someone?”

If you care about not hurting people, you’ll find the right answer, and if an honest mistake happens, own it and people will generally be understandable. It’s really not that different from common courtesy, it just isn’t the norm yet

Just be more careful with gendered language. Also, the trans flag was right there

These ppl just want poor people to die and be served by robots, it’s never gonna work plus we’ll bring them with us

Especially since the solutions are already here, but rich people just don’t like them since it implies the loss of their power