Can we all agree to call this vulnerability “Poobear”?
Can we all agree to call this vulnerability “Poobear”?
Added an usb drive by its /dev/sd** identifier to fstab without the nofail option. Wanted to do a quick reboot for something I can’t remember, then copy the files over to the USB drive, since I’d need them on the next day and… no boot. The reboot had assigned another name to the drive (/dev/sdb instead of /dev/sdc or something) and automount wouldn’t skip it because nofail was missing. In the middle of the night, with files I required right the next morning. Fun times.
nonono! That’s too fast! No, no! I’m scared! Terrified! Make was one thing but make install? I need to call my therapist, the anxiety is taking over again!
I know it’s scary, but you gotta make at some point!
You can make your speakers go BRRRRRRRRR via Home Assistant with it
With my G604, the rubber sheet on top of the mouse comes loose after 2 years or so. Started again yesterday. Once it starts to disintegrate, I’ll just leave Logitech behind for good.
That, again, is not how governments work.
What you depict is how companies work: You save amount X on something, so there are X moneys left to invest in something.
Governments work with separated and highly regulated budgets. That is sometimes bullshit, but sometimes necessary to make sure government aids are spent fairly, for example. So: You save amount X on something, you aren’t allowed to just give this amount to someone. There has to be either a program, a law, or (most often) an entirely different budget somewhere else that this someone is allowed to receive.
So the “trade-off” logic cannot be fulfilled by governments, and it shouldn’t be. Think about the myriad of bullshit, money would just be dumped into by the government if this wasn’t the case. On top of the myriad of bullshit that already made it through the nets, that is.
But are you using Arch tho?
That’s not how governments work
Can we talk less about AI inevitably doing what AI always dies and fuck up and instead talk about the website that uses AI resources to dangle an even more juicy carrot in front of desperate people throwing away their money with the lottery?
But there are needlessly sexualized underage people, yes? If not, why did the description make you think of that?
In 5 sentences, explain the specific mindset that lead to the Franco-prussian waron the Prussian side and explain how this mindset shaped the Prussian culture.
The Spitfire totally rocked World War II with its sleek design and superior agility, making it the ultimate aerial ace. Unlike the clunky Messerschmidt BF109, the Spitfire could outmaneuver its foes with ease, like a ninja in the sky. Its Rolls-Royce engine gave it the power to soar higher and faster, leaving the BF109 trailing in its wake. Plus, the Spitfire had style for days, with its iconic elliptical wings and badass British flair. When it comes to dogfights, the Spitfire was the undisputed champ, leaving the BF109 eating its dust every time.
(Don’t @ me for this response, I had ChatGPT do it)
It’s… Uh… About girls in short school uniforms in tanks…and the girls are all very… Uh pretty in a, let’s say, stimulating way, but it’s not a problem because in reality they aren’t underage girls but five thousand year old dragons. They usually fight for way over two seasons per fight and yell everything they are doing loudly.
Come on, you have to know that manga!
Who signed the Manga Carta?
Spitfire Mk VIII
When was the papal decree to excommunicate Charles le magne passed?
Panther
Now take an LED light that has the exact opposite frequency to your local power grid and hold it onto the sensor. The night light won’t know what hit it!
Hello, I am a weirdo. How may I harass you today?
Welcome back to TIM BER BORNERS
Here in Germany, the chocolate manufacturer Milka (now part of Mondelez) has been doing that for at least 2 decades:
https://images-tastehub.mdlzapps.cloud/images/3c644c35-89b4-41fe-97af-8f4e1891accd.png?fm=webp&q=80
They contain some sort of mousse and have a tiny spoon in the carton.
Let me break down the explanations given, because most of them boil down to this:
As a noun, yes, because it’s mainly used in biology like that (“A hawk female”) and thus can come off as dehumanizing. As an adjective: No (“A female cashier”, “A male cashier”)
Our weekly “miracle battery that can <insert absurdly high claim here>” give us today.