• 0 Posts
  • 70 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle








  • The point of the article is that the costs increased non linearly with the number of user, the cost just keep increasing.

    Maybe why you didn’t notice anything is exactly because they made these spendings to ensure no major hiccups? I’m confident OG Wikipedia code wouldn’t be able to support their internet hosting needs today. Maybe their infrastructure costs would be 100x of today’s if they hadn’t spent the R&D on optimizations?

    A few line before what you quoted: The point is taken into account, the traffic did x12 and the costs of server x33, and the author call it

    This seems reasonable given that they have improved reliability, redundancy and backups.

    since 2005 the WMF has hired hundreds of extra employees and is now spending 1,250 times as much overall

    So the traffic did x12, but the spending on staff did x1250.

    Did you skipped this whole part on purpose or you didn’t read the article completly and jumped to there ?
    You started to say “yes but they didn’t had a single year in a net loss”, the point of the article I sent is that wikipedia is spending too much money because they have too much money.







  • Kuinox@lemmy.worldto3DPrinting@lemmy.worldCNC Kitchen’s website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Really, it is not, it’s just a website that is not bloated. I’m not saying it’s slow, I’m saying it’s the speed of a website not bloated, not a fast website.
    If you search webpage that are made to be fast, the load time are in the 80-200ms of total load time.
    My own website that was made with not much thought for speed reach 100ms on my PC:
    https://draco-lang.org/
    And the SVG are unoptimized.

    Again, it’s a drupal website, it’s the first, or second most popular CMS, there are tons of website running this tech stack.