• 1 Post
  • 21 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 6th, 2024

help-circle
  • Remember they’re doing this so that they can detect it themselves. I’m far from an expert, so maybe I’m misunderstanding something but the way I understand it, they’d be defeating their own tool if they go down this route. If they cycle the logit biases, how can they themselves detect if a random piece of text is generated? Which set of biases do they test?

    At the end of the day, you’re talking about raw text. There’s no option to sign it, or embed metadata or anything like that. You can’t even guarantee that you’re seeing the complete sample, or even a single sample! If there is a fingerprint, it’ll be detectable to anyone, and it’ll be easily removed.






  • Kraiden@kbin.runtoTechnology@lemmy.worldDuckDuckGo AI Chat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Have they said that or are you just implying that? It’s beta right now but I’d put money on them following in Google’s footsteps and integrating right into the main search.

    It’s enshitification because instead of simply fixing their crappy SEO laden results, they’re pushing this new thing.

    I’m also willing to bet that once it’s out of beta there will be either a limit on free searches or it’ll just be straight up subscription model.

    And just like that, normal search is dead, and the only viable option is to pay for their new thing





  • My idea is essentially to match the official stand that ships with it, but flip it and put a stand on the “bottom.” I think it’ll be really nice aesthetically but unfortunately it seems like it’s not as simple as just mirroring it. To tell the truth, I’m probably going to end up going this route anyway, but I feel like I have to at least try the hard way first