• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean, it feels kinda obvious. If there’s any company in this space that would never need to use generative AI, it’s Nintendo. They already employ some of the most talented art teams in the industry, they’re not exactly struggling to produce art or assets.

    If this was from a developer who maybe hasn’t been a gaming monolith for the last 30+ years, that’d be different. This is like if Bill Gates says he promises not to open his 401k early; like, okay cool, I don’t think that was ever in doubt in the last 30 years, Bill, but thanks for letting us know.

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Activision, Ubisoft, and EA, all multibillion game dev company, said they’ll be using generative AI to make their game, so no, it’s not really obvious. It’s also mentioned in the article

      Nintendo’s stance differs from that of other gaming giants. Earlier this year, Ubisoft introduced Project Neural Nexus NEO NPCs, which uses generative AI to simulate in-game conversations and interactions with NPCs.

      Similarly, Square Enix President Takashi Kiryu views generative AI as a business opportunity to create new content using cutting-edge technologies. Electronic Arts (EA) has also embraced generative AI, with CEO Andrew Wilson predicting that over half of EA’s development processes will benefit from advancements in generative AI.

      The investor probably heard it’s a trendy thing that can make better profit, so they asked nintendo about it in the briefing.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Those are the companies that have contributed to the fast churn of creatives getting overworked and leaving the industry, leaving their projects to be driven entirely by excess man-hours and lack of innovation.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Activision, Ubisoft, and EA, all multibillion game dev company, said they’ll be using generative AI to make their game

        Because these companies don’t care stealing assets and work of others. AI makes it very easy and it won’t be too obvious. Problem with AI is, its trained on data they probably have no rights to use for. But its hard to provide evidence, until its too late and obvious.

          • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes and no. The developers mostly still care making good games. Therefore some games are still good. Also we got a few good surprises in the last few years from these companies, so its not all lost.

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      We haven’t really seen high quality art that uses AI as part of the creative process yet, but this could be similar to the animation studios of the 90s who refused to use computers. They’re all out of business now.

      The reality is, generative AI is a really powerful tool, so they will be at a disadvantage going forward if they don’t use it.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh, that’s cool, I respect that.

    Anyone know offhand their stance on jackbooted thugs kicking in the doors of people who write emulation software and sending them to prison? Just trying to get a pulse on that

    • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nintendo is probably the most anti emulation company. They tried to make emulation completely illegal, they sued yuzu (the devs did some things that encouraged that) and made the devs pay a couple million and never develop emulators again. They are also the reason why dolphin didn’t come to steam as they wanted to sue valve if they allowed it on their platform. They also took down various tools that allowed one to rip your own switch games. I think they are for the second point

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They mentioned IP right, and since Japanese police do arrest and charge people for infringing copyright, and since some artist do recognize their work being smashed together to create something else, they might skip this thing for the foreseeable future just to be on the safe side. They know because they’re the one that send police to arrest people.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m with the stance of Valve here. Don’t use AI, if you didn’t train the data yourself. Generative AI can be useful and safe, if you trained it yourself. Using AI itself is not the problem and even Nintendo can benefit from it.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    God dammit Nintendo.

    You’re somehow great AND the actual worst and I fucking hate you for it.

    And I know why it happens, but still. FUCKING HELL.