• intrepid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    253
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can you imagine the amount of corruptive influences and persuasions he is resisting?

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        5 months ago

        Still big kudos to Raymond for providing the foundations to make it all work too.

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Aren’t most lists available on other browsers and ad blockers? Unless Raymond created the format

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            5 months ago

            The format currently used in adblocker predates uBO by almost a decade so no, but still, maintaining this add-on with how fast and often web browser changes, and keeping it performant must be quite the task.

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think performant is probably the key thing here. There were ad blockers before and there are alternative ones now, but the thing that sets unlock Origin apart is how light weight it is.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s kinda sad that without Mozilla, Raymond, the NoScript guys and TOR we would lose control over the internet pretty much immediately

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 months ago

      Kind of agree. Though there is pi-hole and several others. And there’s i2p, Freenet (now called Hyphanet) and GNUnet, and similar.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pi-hole is nice for devices that you don’t fully control. But it’s not enough, due to the fundamental limitations of DNS based blocking. If the ads and the content are hosted on the same domain, it can’t do anything.

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Also issues with links that get ads on top of them. You can still click them, you’ll get redirected to a blank page (because the ad gets DNS blocked), but with an adblocker you would’ve gone to the non-ad link.

    • h05@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I definitely agree, although really a LOT of non-Linux/(IT) guys use Chrome, some even Edge, if on Windows

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        IT person…

        Uses chrome…

        Both cannot be true friend, sorry. Your buddy is either a fake engineer or their main job isn’t IT.

        If you really have friends in IT they haven’t used chrome or edge in a while, or their using the scripting bot for weekly progress reports to their boss, and they’re only using it for that…

    • azalty@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not really anymore for Mozilla. They now get a lot of your private data and share em with their “business partners”

  • DivineDev@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    5 months ago

    If only, I know so many people who don’t bother with adblocking at all. I honestly have no idea how they use the Internet without going mad

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      179
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      My kid discovered that he can hit the “report” button on the YouTube app on the TV to skip the ads immediately. So now every ad gets reported as “inappropriate”.

      I’m proud of him.

      • JVT038@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        69
        ·
        5 months ago

        Tip: if you have an Android TV, you can install SmartTube as an alternative, privacy-friendly YouTube client. It has no ads and sponsorblock integration

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          And as a better option, use an actual device instead of a short lifecycle planned obsolescence embedded android device on a “smart” tv.

          • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            5 months ago

            This is why I refuse to buy a “smart” TV. My old flat screen TV works perfectly fine with a Chromecast with Google TV. I can even use the Chromecast in my projector or any other device with HDMI input to make it smarter than most TV interfaces I have tried.

            • LinusSexTips@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              My cheapo dumb tv died a couple of years back, was a great bit of kit for $400au that gave me 10 years. I’ve got a “smart” tv at the moment which isn’t connected to the internet, and just serves as the display for my Shield TV.

              I’d probably consider an LG commercial / signage display as my next device, some old work connections can get me one as a special purchase through their distribution channels it’s just waiting out the current panel dying.

            • flubba86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I do the same, I use kodi on a CoreElec box on my 10 year old dumb TV. It works great, but my issue is it’s going to be extremely difficult to replace my TV when it gets time to upgrade. (Eg, if I want to move to an OLED, or QD panel). Every new TV on the market is a smart TV. It’s getting to the point that you need to buy a very large monitor, rather than a TV, to achieve the same setup.

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m of two minds about people not adblocking.

      On one hand: Ads are gross noise pollution, and people are increasingly unaware of all the noise around them (or the noise they’re generating) largely because they’ve been passively trained to “tune out” ads. Also consumerism.

      On the other hand: As long as there are a significant amount of people oblivious to the possibility of adblock, corporate ad mobsters and the other worst people in the world out there will largely leave those of us blocking their ads alone. If everyone ran adblockers, we’d definitely live in a world of WEI… and probably worse. So, maybe all those people are watching ads so that I don’t have to, as the YouTube thumbnails say.

      • anothermember@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        If sites wanted to run ads and host them locally without tracking that would be fine. But since they’re tracking users it’s essential to block them for privacy and security, and if someone isn’t then maybe they don’t understand the level of tracking involved. We need a better name than adblocking.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      People just don’t know, I’ve been showing my wife the way little by little and she’s always blown away

      • Damage@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve shown a colleague after seeing him browse an horrendous fantasy football website. He couldn’t believe the difference between before and after.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I also don’t understand it. But now I am wondering if we would not have had those “careless” (indifferent ? ignorant ?) millions of people not blocking ads then Google and others may have started pushing anti-adblock measures years earlier, no ?

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      The way people talk about people who don’t block ads is so funny.

      I understand and respect the reasons people choose to use blockers, but ads honestly just aren’t that problematic for me in practice and are easy to avoid and ignore.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    5 months ago

    Seriously. Says a lot about the modern internet, though. Both good and bad.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 months ago

    He’s far too kind of a person. He doesn’t accept any donations for the many years of a better and safer internet experience I’ve gotten from his work

    • max_adam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      When YouTube was blocking ublock people was surprised that they couldnt donate to the project.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 months ago

      https://github.com/gorhill

      About

      Free. Open-source. For users by users. No donations sought.

      If you ever want to contribute something, think about the people working hard to maintain the filter lists you are using, which are available to use by all for free.