• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Urban sprawl” is an oxymoron. Dense urban areas are good, actually; it’s only the suburbs that sprawl.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It should be called the place with trees and loosely densely population that would be okay if cars weren’t so ubiquitous because some people like space but let’s make sure not to exclude minorities so people don’t end up racist.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is not true? Lots of urban areas can sprawl, not least because of car centric planning (big car parks between islands of actual land use; roads built to ease the traffic of roads; urban ‘islands’ of tall and dense occupation connected by road with slivers of green in-between that don’t serve to actually offer a natural environment. Kuala Lumpur features all of these, for example) but also as economic centres decline and become disused and new developments in other areas spread.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Especially they sprawl when the developers are allowed to do as they please. They want the most profitable option, which is barren and opposed to what people and local government usually want

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tokyo (mostly) isn’t sprawl; that’s just how much space 40 million people take up.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        That is still better than the alternative of suburbs. Could it be better designed or something. Idk, maybe.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Where I live, rich urban areas have plenty of trees and frequently get more planted around. Meanwhile, poorer areas receive zero trees because “they don’t have trees to receive maintenance”.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Despite what you might think of Skynyrd, they cover this topic in a relatable way. Arcade Fire also covers it kind of. Sorry for the links but I’m a huge music nerd.

    Around here, sprawl is a major issue. We have some of the most fertile soils in the world, and we pave over them without regard. It’s abhorrent. I don’t make the ‘most fertile soils’ comment lightly - this is my area of expertise, professionally. The only other places I can think of that have better soil quality than where I live are Russia and the Ukraine.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    Also describes the orcs’ drink they gave to the hobbits very much like you would describe coffee

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      To places where trees grow.

      And build with them, and make yet another Mordor.