I wrote a simple script in order to help someone in a recent reply from me, to make running Flatpak applications from terminal easier. After that I worked a little bit on it further and now ended up with 2 completely different approaches.

  1. flatrun: Run an app by a matching search filter. If multiple matches, then print all matching app ids instead.
  2. flatapp: Show list of installed apps in an interactive menu. Plus show a description of the app in a preview window. Run the selected application. Requires fzf.
  3. flatsearch: Show search results from repository in an interactive menu. A selected entry will be installed or uninstalled if it exists already (with confirmation from flatpak). Requires fzf.
# Show all matching apps
$ flatrun F
com.github.tchx84.Flatseal
io.freetubeapp.FreeTube

# Run io.freetubeapp.FreeTube
$ flatrun freetube

# Show help for com.obsproject.Studio
$ flatrun obs --help

or flatapp: (requires fzf)

and new flatsearch youtube (requires fzf)

  • mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can we just have flatpak apps added to the system path by default? Like have a directory /usr/local/flatpak/bin and have links to all the executable show up there. Then users can choose to add that to their path if they wish.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          No need to feel silly. If you didn’t ask, you wouldn’t learn about it. I learned about it yesterday in the post where I initially gave the first version of the script. It’s a documentation issue I would say, in some way. Such an important part should have been made clear for every user.

          I “insist” you feel not sorry, because I’m in the same boat as you. :D

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          One can just move the path to another place in the $PATH. Not really impossible. Not an elegant solution, just proof of concept:

          export PATH="$(echo "${PATH}" | sed 's+:/var/lib/flatpak/exports/bin++'):/var/lib/flatpak/exports/bin"
          

          Edit:

          Or if it makes you uncomfortable to change the placement of this folder in the $PATH, instead you can just add a new directory solely for this purpose. In example add “/home/yourname/.local/flatpak/bin” (or whatever else you like) and put it in front of the flatpak exports directory.

  • barbara@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    those commands are gold! Thank you for sharing! Saved them. They work flawlessly so far.

    If flatpak search would work with fzf, it would be easier to use and faster than GNOME software

    edit:

    I added echo "${app}" to flatapp in order to print the app in terminal to have a visual response which app will run. (some apps take some seconds to open on my slow machine)

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I thought about additional echo for confirmation too! I will add it too (give me 2 minutes), but it will output to stderr, so it’s not part of regular output.

      Edit: So I added

      echo "flatpak run" "${app}" "${@}" >&2
      

      , which as said will output to stderr instead. And I also decided to add flatpak run and the arguments too, but that’s just an “aesthetic” choice.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hey, I just created a search with fzf menu for install or uninstall app. It’s not pretty, because its a bit unorganized looking and I could not find a good and easy way to solve this. But it seems to be working so far.

      flatsearch

      • barbara@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        That is awesome as well. Incredible what you can do with just a few lines of code.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not really, because the search term can match anywhere in the name. Also it searches in executable name (app id) and the app name, a descriptive text. So its more than a Bash completion would be.