• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It doesn’t matter. One person can’t put forth 48k lifetimes worth of effort, and they don’t deserve that much in return.

    I promise the dude hasn’t worked harder than the combined efforts of 48 thousand people.

    We can reward talent, and we can reward effort. But no combination of those two is as ridiculous as our reward structure. Our reward structure is flawed because people with money make the rules, and their primary rule is that people with money should have more money.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      What you are saying is true, but there is not a better option for how the economy works that doesnt end really bad. I dont like bill gates, but the idea that he cant have what he has doesnt end well.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It turns out we can have the tax rates of the 1950s and 1960s without the segregation.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The federal tax receipts/gdp were pretty much the same as they are right now in the 50s and 60s. Just because the tax rate was high doesnt mean people pay that much.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, what a shame it was that people had to invest in the longevity and reputation of their business in order to keep paying them out over a hundred years.