• nonearther@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    When Google forked from WebKit to create Blink, they had genuine reasons for it.

    Apple was stalling any progress of web by stalling new features in WebKit. They wanted to push their native apps and get big cut from developers’ money.

    Google had to fork and progress web dev further.

    And unfortunately for us, Google folks are greedy assholes who stop at nothing to own everything web even if they have to bend everything.

    WEI is a perfect example.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple was stalling any progress of web by stalling new features in WebKit. They wanted to push their native apps and get big cut from developers’ money.

      I mean, whatever their reasons, for World Wide Web of hypertext pages the list of necessary features shouldn’t be so long.

      So a good thing.

      Anyway, that battle is long lost, so I’m just slowly moving my “internet reading” needs into Gemini. Friends I can’t move, though.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If most of what you want out of the web is browsing static web pages, halting development of standards is fine. But if you want to expose capabilities through the browser like location that are available on new platforms instead of relying on platform-specific apps, you’re going to need new features.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t want that. WWW is not intended for that.

          If you want that, there’s been Flash and Java applets at least allowing whatever you’d like.

          That was the correct way to put cross-platform applications into webpages.

          Don’t tell me about security problems in those, these are present in any piece of software and fixed with new versions, just like with the browser itself.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t want that. WWW is not intended for that.

            Okay, then links awaits you. I’d rather use something that enables powerful in-browser web applications while not relying on a host of proprietary bug ridden plugins.

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, then links awaits you.

              It’s a client for the same broken thing.

              while not relying on a host of proprietary bug ridden plugins

              This is utter bullshit.

              Obfuscated JS is not any less proprietary or bug-ridden than Java bytecode.