• Glitchington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn’t have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Did … did you even read my post? What is going on?

        Let me re-write it using your analogy.

        Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities.

        This isn’t a zero sum game.

        • Glitchington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn’t get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.