cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7235896

Here’s how Kat Marchá describes caracoles:

"you essentially ask to join concentric federations of instances … with smaller caracoles able to vote to federate with entire other caracoles.

And @ophiocephalic’s “fedifams” are a similar idea:

Communities could align into fedifams based on whatever conditions of identity, philosophy or interest are relevant to them. Instances allied into fedifams could share resources and mutually support each other in many way"

The idea’s a natural match for community-focused, anti-surveillance capitalism free fediverses, fits in well with the Networked Communities model and helps address scalability of consent-based federation.

  • MisterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    We can’t even merge similar/identical communities across federated servers and now we have this idea?

    • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The fact that we don’t merge them is one of the great benefits of the Fediverse, actually.