• cassie 🐺@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 天前

    not OP, but I’m in two minds about it. I don’t really care to step in on caitlyn’s behalf, she can kick rocks for all I care. and I don’t think the intent of the post was hateful, but whenever a trans person does something bad and newsworthy, deadnames start to come out and even if it’s directed at someone I actively despise it still sucks to read. revoking someone’s chosen name out of personal disgust is just something we deal with irl a lot. it’s a similar kind of ick as when a female politician does something reprehensible and the discourse gets flooded by a bunch of people crudely commenting on her appearance.

    eta: with a very minor change this same exact point could be made without deadnaming her, so to me it’s uncomfortable and unnecessary.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 天前

      revoking someone’s chosen name out of personal disgust

      The tweet does not call Caitlyn Bruce, it’s telling Caitlyn than the president ordered the government to call her Bruce.

      Mentioning a deadname is not the same as deadnaming, this is not like saying “Jehovah” or something. I understand that just bringing up someone’s deadname can be jarring to at least a portion of trans people but, like, that’s the point here. Shock her into realising what’s being done to, also, her.

    • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 天前

      Yeah this is exactly how I feel and why I didn’t really wanna argue about this further, she’s the last person I’d wanna defend but I still felt like it should be pointed out.