• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    It is sarcastic.

    Wanna know the first time I heard “This is the Year of the Linux Desktop!”? 1999.

    Yes, nineteen ninety-nine. Twenty-five years ago.

    Linux as a desktop is still a laugh. It still doesn’t come close to Windows of twenty-five years ago.

    But it’s killer as a server, or a purpose-built system. My NAS/VM server kicks ass under Linux, way better than running windows. Even VMware recently switched their desktop virtualization to using Linux. This is where Linux shines.

    You could make a Windows killer desktop, except which distro? Which shell? Which set of base tools/utilities? Define “killer desktop” in the Linux community.

    Windows is the general purpose OS, with a common shell. That’s what MS did, settle on one UI (mostly), so it’s a common experience everywhere.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Linux as a desktop is still a laugh. It still doesn’t come close to Windows of twenty-five years ago.

      Pfft, several Linux distros are an excellent desktop OS and I think people who argue against that aren’t worth my time.

      • SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Naive take imo. No distro is an excellent desktop. They all have flaws and issues that are not present in windows to an “average user”. Regular users barely know how to install apps on their phones. To be excellent all intelligence groups should be able to easily use it

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          When people say shit like this, they seem to forget the vast amounts of issues that windows also has. How long has it been since the last time an update bricked millions of machines? Even when you only talk about things MS is directly responsible for, that timespan rarely exceeds a year. And this is even with their enormous budget and army of vendors essentially beta testing and partnering with them to keep shit like that from happening.