• cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Wrong question. The right question is: is the solar panel able to be CO2 neutral (at least) or CO2 negative. We don’t get anything out of it if producing the solar panel costs more CO2 emissions than it saves by producing electricity.

      Before you ask: I don’t know the answer. I was looking into this thread in hope to find it.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Most people don’t care about being CO2 neutral. The real question is what is the ROI? Will the panel save that person money. If it takes 50 years to pay for itself, I’d say that’s bad. 10 years is more standard. 5 years I say it’s a no brainer. Though I suppose you can also argue value for utility, if that is giving her the ability to power something off grid that would be worth something.

        • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          In Germany those panels usually pay themselves after about 5 years depending on the price of the necessary electronics (don’t forget the electricity meter!) and if there’s also a battery.

          • DerGottesknecht@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            51 minutes ago

            You don’t need a smart meter for this, just plug and play. If seen offers for complete sets from as low as 250€ in supermarkets, so almost everyone can get one and start saving some power.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I hung a solar panel vertically on my fence one time. It was facing west rather than south, but I was only getting about 3-4 watts on my 100 watt panel under the best conditions.