• Daedskin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I like the sentiment of the article; however this quote really rubs me the wrong way:

    I’m not suggesting we abandon AI tools—that ship has sailed.

    Why would that ship have sailed? No one is forcing you to use an LLM. If, as the article supposes, using an LLM is detrimental, and it’s possible to start having days where you don’t use an LLM, then what’s stopping you from increasing the frequency of those days until you’re not using an LLM at all?

    I personally don’t interact with any LLMs, neither at work or at home, and I don’t have any issue getting work done. Yeah there was a decently long ramp-up period — maybe about 6 months — when I started on ny current project at work where it was more learning than doing; but now I feel like I know the codebase well enough to approach any problem I come up against. I’ve even debugged USB driver stuff, and, while it took a lot of research and reading USB specs, I was able to figure it out without any input from an LLM.

    Maybe it’s just because I’ve never bought into the hype; I just don’t see how people have such a high respect for LLMs. I’m of the opinion that using an LLM has potential only as a truly last resort — and even then will likely not be useful.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Why would that ship have sailed?

      Because the tools are here and not going anyway

      then what’s stopping you from increasing the frequency of those days until you’re not using an LLM at all?

      The actually useful shit LLMs can do. Their point is that using only majorly an LLM hurts you, this does not make it an invalid tool in moderation

      You seem to think of an LLM only as something you can ask questions to, this is one of their worst capabilities and far from the only thing they do