• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    They’re conveniently leaving out the entire concept of Socialism for some reason, while making sure to mention Marxism by name.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      I leave out “socialism” because for the vast majority of actual implementations, they have been Marxist in character, and additionally any Socialist system in my opinion would either progress to Communism or regress to Capitalism, making it kind of redundant to split from Communism.

      Communism isn’t a type of Socialism if we are being nitpicky, but the Mode of Production after Socialism.