• sci@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They didn’t. They did confirm ufo sightings but there’s nothing said on aliens/extraterrestrial origin.

          • hungry_freaks_daddy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I welcome physical proof as well. But this isn’t Bigfoot or Loch Ness or anything like that. There’s a mountain of testimony spanning decades. Too much smoke for there to be no fire.

            • shapis@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I welcome physical proof as well. But this isn’t Bigfoot or Loch Ness or anything like that. There’s a mountain of testimony spanning decades. Too much smoke for there to be no fire.

              That’s not how it works. Evidence isn’t a “nice to have” on top of everything else, it’s the bare minimum. Everything else is hearsay.

              When something is real it doesn’t beg for your trust, it begs for your eyes.

              • Jazzy Vidalia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Show me a body or show me a craft. And do it in a way that is undeniable. This should not be that hard if the evidence actually were there. It’s a pretty simple conundrum. The obfuscation necessary to present these things as real would not be present if they were actually real.

                As far as I am concerned the whole UFO phenomenon is a psy-op to keep bottom-scraping “researchers” busy, to promote the idea that the US in possision of superior alien technology (master race BS similar to late Nazi-era propaganda), and an attempt at getting other nations to waste money attempting to either “catch up” or attempt to spy on these assets. It also is a way for the military-industrial complex to go to Congree and beg for more money to combat these non-existant aliens and their phantom technology.

                • lorez@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They stated there’s no way for us to contrast ‘em. This was the guy on the right, the pilot. He said they’re too fast.

            • gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is also decades of proof of crazies getting into higher official positions. I don’t get why it’s harder to believe that these testimonies come from further crazies than believing that there is a huge, international, decade long cover up of alien contact.

              • hungry_freaks_daddy@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                shrugs. Idk what else to tell you. I’ve been following this stuff for a long long long time and this is ‘the moment’. People can continue to bury their head in the sand and stick their fingers in their ears or whatever they want to do.

                This is real and it’s happening now and we get to watch it in real time.

        • Jazzy Vidalia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every time I hear the phrase “under oath” I mentally replace it with “pinky promise” because it all has tbe exact same amount of weight. There’s no reason to assume someone is being truthful just because they promised you they aren’t lying.

          Then there is the technicality of “if they believe it is the truth then they aren’t lying” so as long as other have convinced them enough for them to believe it, then they haven’t broken their oath.

          This is just meaningless elementary school behavior from adults and anyone that can’t see that or thinks oaths and such symbolic social constructs are meaningful are not worth taking seriously.

          • whiskyriot@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Unlike pinky promising, there are serious criminal penalties for lying under oath. It’s perjury and counts as a felony and comes with up to 7 years in prison. Not to mention what it would do to your career, especially a career in the military/intelligence.

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              so as long as other have convinced them enough for them to believe it, then they haven’t broken their oath.

              • whiskyriot@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I agree. Grusch could have been misled and bought into lies/misinformation. But at the very least I think HE believes it or wouldn’t be putting his career in jeopardy by reporting to Inspector Generals and testifying to Congress.

                The above poster makes it sound like he is likely to be lying about it, which I think is a weak character attack and not arguing in good faith.

                Don’t forget, along with the oral and written testimony, Grusch supposedly provided enough evidence to the ICIG to warrant an “urgent and credible” threat.

            • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              For those serious criminal penalties to happen, you’d have to prove that the testimony was a deliberate lie. So, once again, we’re back to proof. Besides, the guy with the most interesting testimony only offered up hearsay - things he was told by others. He didn’t claim to personally have seen any wreckage, alien bodies, etc.

              Even reading about it felt like a waste of time. My sympathies to anyone who actually watched it live.

              • lorez@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                To me the most interesting one was the testimony, video and all the rest from the pilot of the tic tac incident.