• ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    16 hours ago

    … bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…

    one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.

    … while they get super rich off it.

    because they’re only focusing on this.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think Andreessen is lying and the “techno optimist manifesto” is a ruse for PR.

        a16z has been involved in various crypto pump and dumps. They are smart enough to know that something like “play to earn” is not sustainable and always devolves into a pyramid scheme. Doesn’t stop them from getting in early and dumping worthless tokens on the marks.

        The manifesto honestly reads like it was written by a teenager. The style, the tone, the excessive quotes from economists. This is pretty typical stuff for American oligarch polemics, no?

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Oh they definitely exist. At a high level the bullshit is driven by malicious greed, but there are also people who are naive and ignorant and hopeful enough to hear that drivel and truly believe in it.

      Like when Microsoft shoves GPT4 into notepad.exe. Obviously a terrible terrible product from a UX/CX perspective. But also, extremely expensive for Microsoft right? They don’t gain anything by stuffing their products with useless annoying features that eat expensive cloud compute like a kid eats candy. That only happens because their management people truly believe, honest to god, that this is a sound business strategy, which would only be the case if they are completely misunderstanding what GPT4 is and could be and actually think that future improvements would be so great that there is a path to mass monetization somehow.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s not what’s happening here. Microsoft management are well aware that AI isn’t making them any money, but the company made a multi billion dollar bet on the idea that it would, and now they have to convince shareholders that they didn’t epicly fuck up. Shoving AI into stuff like notepad is basically about artificially inflating “consumer uptake” numbers that they can then show to credulous investors to suggest that any day now this whole thing is going to explode into an absolute tidal wave of growth, so you’d better buy more stock right now, better not miss out.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yeah my management was all gungho about exploiting AI to do all sorts of stuff.

        Like read. Not generative AI crap, but read. They came to us and said quite literally: “how can we use something like ChatGPT and make it read.”

        I don’t know who or how they convinced them to use something that wasn’t generative AI, but it did convince me that managers think someone being convincing and confident is correct all the time.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No no, I disagree I think that shoving AI into all these apps is a solid plan on their behalf. People are going to stop recall and shut it off. So instead they put AI components into every app, It now has the right to overview everything you’re doing and every app collects data on you sending it home to update their personalized models for you so they can better sell you products.