asudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up1732arrow-down1106 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1626arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square204fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.world
minus-squareschizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·15 days agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-squarehumorlessrepost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·15 days agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).