• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not strange to have one weapon being the most meta one in the server. Spear or any long poking stick has been THE meta for a long time, backed by bow. Then crossbow came along, then gun. All these are very much usable by peasant that can be quickly trained to use one. Drone though, that thing need time to specialise. It’s the new meta because the thing is cheap to produce and can defeat million dollar equipment easily

    Am not looking forward when automated murder drone became the new meta.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    What drone is OP getting that it’s only $35? I don’t think I’ve seen them from anything less than about $200 and a good one is about $500 to $700

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You aren’t looking at the same shit. There are extremely high tech drones that are huge and designed for long term use. These aren’t those. These are made as cheaply as they possibly can with one single goal: get this explosive to it’s destination. They are single flight devices.

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Analog fpv drone is at least €150 when produced on a mass scale. Parts alone.

        This is nowhere near 35 bucks cheap.

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          But those FPV drones have to be reusable. A kamikaze drone only needs to last long enough to get to the target. Motors, batteries, etc don’t need to have long lifetimes. Think about how cheap the battery can be if it doesn’t need to be rechargeable. If the motor needs at most 5 hours of runtime?

          Even if they have a 10% spontaneous failure rate of they’re 30% the price it’d still be worth it.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            It won’t make much of a difference. They put rechargeable batteries in disposable vapes because it isn’t worth it to manufacture non-rechargeable batteries, even though the batteries would be technically cheaper, the specialized manufacturing process would be more expensive.

          • el_bhm@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, precisely right. When compared to military precission weapons. That start at tens of thousands.

            And I gave as real of a number as possible, so there are no idiots thinking an fpv drone costs 35 bucks. Even if it has to fly once.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        This particular one is the Mavic 3 pro, indeed around that price with the accessories. It’s what I fly for work.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right? I’ll give OP $50 a pop to source those $35 drones that are at least good enough to strap a grenade to and kill people. I don’t wanna kill people, but if it can carry a grenade, it can probably carry a camera and stuff.

    • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve flown a number of drones and the best drone I’ve flown that clocks in under £100 is a tiny-whoop and they’re absolutely not fit for combat lol.

        • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Tiny-whoop more reffers to a class of FPVs rather than any specific drone. They’re small enough to be flown around indoors and typically weigh in at under 25g TOM. I guess you could use one for surveillance or scoping out a building in the field but defo not for combat lol

          • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’m honestly getting confused by this thread now with how many of you are talking about frankly unrelated stuff. These aren’t for “combat” so much as they are for flying an explosive to a target one time and not surviving. The article used a generic picture.

  • THCDenton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Got into fpv after watching Ukrainian highlight reels. Aside from the manmade horrors beyond comprehension it looked really fun.