• muertinez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    i think people underestimate the impact having access to wikipedia has had on the world. really an amazingly important part of the internet and the sharing of knowledge

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Going down a Wikipedia rabbit hole is worse than going down a Street View rabbit hole. Ahh I can spend an entire day doing it!

    • Bilbo Baggins@hobbit.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, although if you ever get the chance to browse a real physical encyclopedia, it’s a unique experience.

      Not practical, but it’s a bit like playing a record or playing a game on a real NES. It’s a unique experience.

      I have a full 2007 set of Encyclopedia Brittanica in the same room as my vintage computer collection. I browse it occasionally.

      • dropte_eth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oof, felt this right in the geriatric millennials.

        Mfer I was doing assignments where I had to scroll through index cards to find the encyclopaedia, then hand write out the essay.

        It’s weird when you go from being the disruptor demographic to realising that when your 5 yo kid jokes about the 80s it’s as far away in time to him as the 1940s we’re to me - for him it’s a 2d, pre-Alexa, analog dystopia.

        And I’m only 42.

      • bigredcar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I bought several physical encyclopedias as a a result of my Wikipedia addiction. Having physical encyclopedias to fall back on is a plus, as their information can’t be taken down by deletionists. I also got the Encarta isos off archive.org running in 86box.

        • mochi@lemdit.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I got suckered by an encyclopedia salesman when I was younger. It was one of the biggest wastes of money of my young life. I had no need for it at that time and later, when I could have used it, I had the internet (or Internet with a capital I back then) and college libraries.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just love the fact that Jimmy Wales started Wikipedia using the money he made in softcore internet porn.

    • hansl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unpopular opinion? Mastodon is a better Twitter than Lemmy is a better Reddit.

      So many duplicated communities in Lemmy makes managing subscription impossible.

      • DooDeeDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Reddits quality main appeal also is its past threads whereas on Twitter is rarely about what was tweeted but rather what’s the latest thing that’s happening.

        Lemmy will need time and it might never replace reddit. But I look forward to the quality interactions with everyone here!

      • samsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read somewhere this is an upcoming feature. Let’s say you subscribe “memes” then you got shown all communities named “memes” from federated servers combined.

  • ngcbassman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just going to take the opportunity to talk about that Wikipedia is free, it doesn’t have advertisement, all the data is freely accesible and your privacy is respected, is just maintained by donations and the community. Just looking around other platforms I think they do an amazing job, so consider to donate today to keep it that way.

    • ruk_n_rul@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      they have more than enough money to keep the server running for decades. not to say you don’t need to donate, but you don’t need to impulse donate every time the big header appears.

      • Rev. Layle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I donate about 100 USD a year, give or take. I figured it’s worth it for as much as I use Wikipedia

      • ngcbassman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fully transparent I donate 1 dollar a day, I just appreciate what they do, and I would like to have more services that are able to keep it that way, sadly that is not the case.

  • Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope custom algorithms become an option. I like chronological feeds but would love to have chronological feeds that show me a post based on my likes after 3 posts or so. It would make it much easier to discover new blender artists like is possible on twitter

  • Jarmer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    that’s excellent! I wonder if they’ll keep their WT Social network going. Does anyone use it?