flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoOpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Freefuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square456fedilinkarrow-up11.62Karrow-down137cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Freefuturism.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square456fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agoI disagree. Laws aren’t always moral. Texas could outlaw donations to the Rainbow Railroad and it would be wrong, the organization should still exist. But in this case it is pretty clear that the plagiarism machine is in fact, bad and should not exist, at least not in it’s current form.
minus-squaredrislands@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoI feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it’s actually fine. Maybe that’s just semantics.
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI don’t think the people who are supporters of jury nullification are saying such laws are fine.
I disagree. Laws aren’t always moral. Texas could outlaw donations to the Rainbow Railroad and it would be wrong, the organization should still exist.
But in this case it is pretty clear that the plagiarism machine is in fact, bad and should not exist, at least not in it’s current form.
I feel like in that case one would be loudly fighting to get the law changed, rather than insisting it’s actually fine. Maybe that’s just semantics.
I don’t think the people who are supporters of jury nullification are saying such laws are fine.