• glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a good article, but the title is misleading.

    The FBI paid a company to find a few people’s locations, and they were under the impression that the company would use in-house software, not NSO spyware.

    At no point did the FBI use NSO spyware. Riva Networks did.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can argue its misleading but I disagree. Outsourcing bad behavior to a third party doesn’t remove culpability on your part. This is all to common these days and allows both parties to point fingers at each other while nobody faces any responsibility for breaking the law, violating people’s rights, and/or unethical behavior.

      The FBI just using assumptions and impressions on methodologies used by the company they contracted with is no excuse when they could have asked how the work was going to be performed. Incompetence is no excuse either.

      • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not saying the FBI should be excused for this. I’m saying the title is factually wrong and is designed to provoke attention

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even with that I think it’s debatable. They were employed by the FBI at the time of usage so it isn’t totally inaccurate to say it was the FBI doing it and we don’t know what knowledge the FBI guys had of the company’s methods.

    • itchy_lizard@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At no point did the US military torture hostages in those blacksites.

      Not sure it matters. The responsibility still lies with the org that paid.