New research shows renewables are more profitable than nuclear power::In a recent study, researchers from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), the Stockholm School of Economics (SSE), and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) questioned the planned development of new nuclear capacities in the energy strategies of the United States and certain European countries.

  • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably because the whole industry keeps talking about them. Plus some are already in testing I believe, others are still being planned. We did it for nuclear submarines so it’s definitely possible.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying SMRs are impossible, I’m saying that the cost of them when compared to renewables is so ridiculously high that there’s no business case for them. We did it for submarines because you can’t use solar panels and wind turbines to power them.

      • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can’t use renewables for all power generation though. We don’t have the energy storage for that. Also over the long term nuclear can be profitable - it just requires a lot of investment and planning

          • areyouevenreal@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My guy if it wasn’t profitable companies wouldn’t build them.

            The fact you think we don’t need baseliad power is very questionable. Like where are you going to store all the energy from these renewables?

            Where are you getting your information from?