Manipulating the audience doesn’t encourage good faith discussion.

This is what happens to IT professionals when the centralization of textbook design is no longer appropriate the situations. All they’ve got is a hammer. So, everything’s a nail, even if it means lying.

There’s application in responding to requests for information quickly, in a mesh network, perhaps in presence of malactors. For example the medical records of injured US soldiers are stored in and delivered using a block chain solution.

There’s application in a hypothetical currency free from the corruption of governance. For example, an orange President couldn’t print gobs of money during a pandemic, devaluing your currency, then hand that money to corporations.

Seatbelts - Gotta Knock a Little Harder

An LLM?

Edit: Everything is of far less significance relative IRL relationships. The overriding goal of ML analysis model with a subordinated LLM hasn’t been to create a space for the best mental masturbation, instead to better focus subsequent human efforts in organizational recruitment for education and praxis.

In the future?

He always takes the bait. I think it’s funny.

Ignorance is bliss.

Ignorance is bliss.

What’s meritable often isn’t popular. By what metric should comments be rated?

Many will rate high. By what means can the set be further narrowed?

But, squid, you don’t have any friends on the .ml mod team else you’d have already called in a favor.

Undergrad. You’ve no degree and no work experience. Perhaps the most important thing you’re going to learn from this project is humility.

All his conclusions and logical fallacy align with the neoliberal flavor of the day. Why the fuck would you start a discussion, squid, while claiming this isn’t the place to discuss? Typical.

deleted by creator

emergency services use the same roads and your protest will kill someone

As soon as law enforcement stops killing us for funsies I’ll start caring about the vague hypothetical that a neoliberal gets hurt by accident.

You left out a core argument against high-priced art: A large proportion of transactions have the underlying intent of money laundering, illegal kickbacks, and tax avoidance.

Don’t tell him his shallow neoliberalism is flawed under penalty of bot down votes and ban. He’s not a healthy person.

deleted by creator

A lion sucks if measured as a bird.

Yet, it takes an enormous amount of processing power to produce a comment such as this one. How much would it take to reason why the experiment was structured as it was?