The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has slapped coding boot camp BloomTech with several punishments for alleged deceptive business practices.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 months ago

    The US government under Obama and Biden has taken a lot less crap from these for profit schools. Although this is separate from Dept of Ed stuff

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Meanwhile, the government under Trump had one of these assholes literally in charge of the department of education because corruption is totally OK if you have an R by your name.

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I thought she mainly worked in religious schools? Probably still non-profits

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has slapped coding boot camp BloomTech with several punishments for alleged deceptive business practices.

    The business, which claims on its site it will help students land their “dream job” in tech at companies like Amazon, Cisco, and Google, accepted the consent order without admitting or denying any wrongdoing.

    BloomTech, formerly Lambda School, has operated since 2017 and offers six- to nine-month vocational programs in science and engineering, with a focus on computer technology.

    “BloomTech and its CEO sought to drive students toward income share loans that were marketed as risk-free, but in fact carried significant finance charges and many of the same risks as other credit products,” said Rohit Chopra, director of the CFPB.

    On top of that, the CFPB claimed BloomTech broke the Holder Rule by neglecting to afford students certain rights when it sold loans to investors, which is illegal according to the consumer protection watchdog.

    “We decided to settle the matter because it was clear that ongoing litigation would be extremely time consuming, incredibly expensive, and distract us from our core mission,” the CEO said.


    The original article contains 726 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Core mission being scamming people for more money, I guess?

      Has anyone had experience with them? Maybe heard from a friend or acquaintance? I wonder if they really provide meaningful education at all

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s a contract.

        They give you some money now, and, instead of an interest rate and a term for repayment, they get a percentage of your future income for some period of time.

        Particularly shitty ones continue even if you repay the original loan amount.

        • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It looks like they didn’t even get the money, these were “student loans” so the money just went to pay for the tuition.