• M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love this idea.

    What if cities implemented special routes that are cycle only routes.

    They could make small roads that lead to popular parts of the city easily and safely bikeable.

    God! I wish my roads were not so dangerous.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It takes so little effort to just create 2-3 routes going along each cardinal direction of a city if you compare it to normal road infrastructure, but it massively improves the cycling experience.

  • talivision@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I cycled through here earlier this year! Beautiful part of the world. Are you going along the EV15?

  • Rivoluzione mobilità urbana🚶🚲🚋@mastodon.uno
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    As much as I like the idea, the naming is completely wrong and the concept should be corrected

    In UK the “cycle super-highways” are successful, but only for a part of the population (young white males).

    The term “highways” is a legacy from automobile and comes with ideas of speed and danger.

    We should go in a different direction and try to be inclusive. We want families riding their bikes with kids. We want women and we want people of all origins too.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm_o4ZsD01M

    @IHateReddit

    • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Hahaha this is the kind of idea that halts all development so some stupid comittee can discuss names for years. Who cares what the name is? Highway is an okay name

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      So, “express network” instead of “highway”. But other than marketing/communication, I didn’t see much concrete suggestions of how to make them more inclusive.

      • Rivoluzione mobilità urbana🚶🚲🚋@mastodon.uno
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        @joostjakob AFAIK the discussion is open. The naming is one thing, and communication and promotion should follow along.

        If you look at a video of a cycle super-highways in London and on of a “continous cycle road” (I don’t know the precise name)in the Netherlands you will see a stark difference.

        I wouldn’t bring my kid on the the former, but I would on the latter.

    • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The idea that only young white males will know not to be afraid of the term “cycle super-highway” is insulting to the very people you want to be inclusive to.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      What a stupid take. A name is just a name, any connotations are made up by experience. If your cycling highway isn’t safe for drivers that’s an issue, but not caused by the name. What the fuck. Highway is also not exclusive towards women and people of color. I repeat, what the fuck.